SPOT

Spotify Technology S.A. Price

SPOT
$481,35
-$3,13(-%0,64)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-07 19:53 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-07 19:53, Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) is priced at $481,35, with a total market cap of $99,30B, a P/E ratio of 45,89, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $476,40 and $488,96. The current price is %1,03 above the day's low and %1,55 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 198,38K. Over the past 52 weeks, SPOT has traded between $405,00 to $785,00, and the current price is -%38,68 away from the 52-week high.

SPOT Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$484,48
Market Cap$99,30B
Volume198,38K
P/E Ratio45,89
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Diluted EPS (TTM)10,74
Net Income (FY)$2,21B
Revenue (FY)$17,18B
Earnings Date2026-04-28
EPS Estimate3,44
Revenue Estimate$5,22B
Shares Outstanding204,96M
Beta (1Y)1.702

About SPOT

Spotify Technology S.A., together with its subsidiaries, provides audio streaming services worldwide. It operates through Premium and Ad-Supported segments. The Premium segment offers unlimited online and offline streaming access to its catalog of music and podcasts without commercial breaks to its subscribers. The Ad-Supported segment provides on-demand online access to its catalog of music and unlimited online access to the catalog of podcasts to its subscribers on their computers, tablets, and compatible mobile devices. The company also offers sales, marketing, contract research and development, and customer support services. As of December 31, 2021, its platform included 406 million monthly active users and 180 million premium subscribers in 184 countries and territories. The company was incorporated in 2006 and is based in Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryInternet Content & Information
CEOAlex Norström
HeadquartersLuxembourg City,None,LU
Official Websitehttps://www.spotify.com
Employees (FY)7,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$2,45M
Net Income per Employee$316,00K

Learn More about Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)

Gate Learn Articles

What is Spot Trading?

Spot trading refers to the direct trading of spot assets, where the delivery of assets is completed in a timely manner after the transaction is done, with the buyer receiving the spot assets and the seller receiving the corresponding currency.

2022-11-21

Contracts and Spot Trading

This article explores the differences and applicable situations between futures trading and spot trading. Futures trading is a financial instrument that allows investors to trade based on the future price trend of assets. It has the characteristics of leverage, long and short positions, and high risk and high returns. Spot trading, on the other hand, is a trading method for immediate buying and selling of assets. Its characteristics include immediate delivery, no leverage, and asset ownership. The article compares the operation methods, risks and rewards, investment strategies, and advantages and disadvantages of the two, and provides guidance on how to choose the appropriate trading method based on personal risk tolerance, investment goals, and market knowledge. It emphasizes that regardless of the chosen method, mastering the basic knowledge and investing prudently are crucial.

2025-01-30

Long-Term Impact of Hong Kong Crypto Spot ETFs

The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong has officially announced the list of approved virtual asset spot ETFs, including Huaxia (Hong Kong), CSOP International, Bosera International's Bitcoin spot ETF, and Ethereum spot ETF. These six Hong Kong spot ETFs have obtained a decent initial scale through subscription, but their trading volume on the first day was far smaller than their counterparts in the United States. SoSoValue researcher Tom Analysis provided analysis based on supply and demand dynamics.

2024-05-12

Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) FAQ

What's the stock price of Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) today?

x
Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) is currently trading at $481,35, with a 24h change of -%0,64. The 52-week trading range is $405,00–$785,00.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)?

x

Should you buy or sell Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)?

x

How to buy Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) Latest News

2026-04-07 17:47

ETH 15-minute rise of 0.58%: large on-chain transfers strengthen liquidity, and combined with easing ETF selling pressure, it lifts spot buying demand

2026-04-07 17:30 to 17:45 (UTC), ETH’s return rate over 15 minutes was +0.58%. The price range was 2085.28 to 2115.38 USDT, with a swing of 1.44%. During this period, trading activity was active; market attention rose rapidly. Short-term volatility intensified, and liquidity improved noticeably. The main driver of this abnormal move was that large on-chain transfers were concentrated in this window. Some long-term holdings were transferred to exchange addresses, greatly increasing market liquidity and leading to thicker spot buy orders. In addition, the ETF capital outflow trend significantly slowed in this window. Along with some institutional funds returning to the spot market, it directly pushed prices higher. On-chain data shows that spot buy orders and improved liquidity formed a resonance effect in a short time, which had a clear positive pull on returns. Meanwhile, ETH’s average network Gas fees fell to about $0.15, significantly improving the efficiency of capital entering and exiting trades, reducing the costs of bridging and arbitrage, and further boosting capital activity. The share of derivatives trading increased; some derivatives capital shifted to the spot market, strengthening spot price support. From a technical perspective, ETH’s price broke above the short-term symmetrical triangle’s upper boundary, and the structural breakout amplified volatility. In addition, changes in on-chain holding structures and synchronized stablecoin flows strengthened market momentum, and multiple factors’ resonance amplified the upward move. Pay attention to subsequent large transfers and ETF fund flow. If, in the short term, there is again a concentration of capital outflows, the risk of spot price volatility may rise. At the same time, closely track network congestion and changes in Gas fees to prevent unexpected increases in transaction costs from weighing on liquidity. Key focus areas include the $2100 support level and the inflow and outflow of funds at major exchanges. Be alert to intraday liquidity contraction and the impact of sudden macro news on the market. Real-time market commentary can further help capture abnormal-move opportunities and risks.

2026-04-07 15:32

BTC 15-minute rise of 0.45%: driven by routine trading, with moderately resonating macro hedging sentiment

From 15:15 to 15:30 (UTC) on 2026-04-07, Bitcoin (BTC) recorded a +0.45% return. The price edged up within the 67,886.0 to 68,199.5 USDT range, with a 0.46% amplitude. Market attention increased during this period, but overall volatility remained within the usual range, with no abnormal market moves. The main driving force behind this deviation was regular trading activity in the spot market. On-chain data shows that the number of active addresses in the 15-minute window was about 66,000, slightly higher than the previous cycle. In the same period, spot trading volume grew by about 0.5% month-over-month, which was basically consistent with the magnitude of the price deviation. This indicates that market participation rose slightly in the short term, pushing the current price up moderately. There were no extreme events such as large transfers or a single source of funds driving the move, as reflected across on-chain activity, spot settlement, and fund flow indicators. In addition, the macro environment created a mild synchronization effect on market sentiment. The U.S. Federal Reserve kept the benchmark interest rate unchanged, oil prices stayed elevated due to geopolitical conflicts, and inflation expectations were raised to 2.7%, which strengthened the short-term appeal of crypto assets and brought some inflows of risk-averse capital. However, indicators such as large on-chain transfers, ETF holdings, and net inflows to trading platforms remained within normal ranges. There were no abnormal changes in whale or institutional holdings. The derivatives market was also steady, and amplifying factors such as liquidations and leveraged position unwinds did not appear. Overall, this deviation reflected a mild convergence of multiple factors and falls within the scope of normal market fluctuations. The main BTC volatility risks right now revolve around macro uncertainties and changes in large on-chain capital flows. If, in the future, geopolitical conflicts intensify, inflation diverges from expectations, or events such as large on-chain transfers and concentrated ETF redemptions occur, they could trigger more significant market-level swings. It is recommended to watch key support/resistance levels, on-chain address anomalies, and changes in spot and derivatives trading volumes to respond to short-term risks in a timely manner. To get more real-time market information, please continue to monitor subsequent market developments.

2026-04-07 14:33

Spot gold fell by more than $20 to $4,625 per ounce, and spot silver dropped below $71

Gate News message, April 7, the market data shows that spot gold fell by more than $20 in the short term, with the latest quote at $4,625 per ounce. New York futures silver is down 3.00% during the day, trading at $70.66 per ounce; spot silver has pulled back to below $71 per ounce, down 2.46% for the day.

2026-04-07 14:17

BTC 15-minute drop of 0.51%: short-term capital outflow and macro volatility converging to trigger a pullback

From 2026-04-07 14:00 to 2026-04-07 14:15 (UTC), the BTC price ranged between 67801.3 and 68256.1 USDT. The candlestick chart recorded a -0.51% return, with a trading range of 0.67%. Short-term volatility intensified, and market attention increased significantly. Overall liquidity remains within the normal range, but there have been marginal changes. The main drivers behind this unusual move are a short-term capital outflow effect and a synchronized rise in exchange net inflows. Short-term holders take profits or cut losses at volatility turning points, which pushes the price lower. Spot trading volume during this period increased by 12% month-over-month compared with the previous hour, while exchange net inflow accounted for 2.1% of the day’s total flow. This indicates that some existing funds chose to exit, amplifying downside pressure. In addition, increased macro-market volatility and a more cautious overall flow of ETF funds formed a resonance. In Q1 2026, ETF funds generally trended toward net outflows. In early April, institutional wait-and-see sentiment intensified. During this period, there were no notable anomalies in ETF subscriptions and redemptions, but sentiment continued to exert sustained pressure on the market. At the same time, uncertainty in the global macro environment increased, and expectations for monetary policy among major economies diverged. Some funds engaged in short-term tactical games between traditional markets and crypto assets. These structural factors collectively amplified the magnitude of BTC price volatility in this round. At the current market stage, it is important to remain alert to further liquidity contraction and sudden shifts in institutional fund flows, especially signals such as concentrated ETF redemptions or a sharp drop in on-chain activity. Looking ahead, focus can be placed on key support levels, fund net flow direction, and macro policy developments. Stay vigilant regarding trading conditions where high-frequency trading and short-term sentiment are concentrated, and use more real-time market data and on-chain data to support judgment.

2026-04-07 13:31

CleanSpark sells 405 spot BTC in March, increasing its Bitcoin holdings to 13,561 BTC

Gate News message. On April 7, the Nasdaq-listed bitcoin miner CleanSpark released its March operating report. The report shows that the company produced 658 BTC in mining output in March, sold 405 spot BTC during the same period, and sold 500 BTC based on options exercised. As of March 31, CleanSpark’s bitcoin holdings totaled 13,561 BTC. In addition, as of the end of March, the company had deployed approximately 224k mining machines, with a running hashrate of 50.0 EH/s.

Hot Posts About Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)

Katemin97

Katemin97

12 minutes ago
#GateSquareAprilPostingChallenge “Ethereum Divergence from Bitcoin” Extended Version Title: Bitcoin is called Digital Gold. Ethereum is called Digital Infrastructure. This is why this distinction may be more important than ever in 2026. Bitcoin is trading at $68,482. Ethereum is trading at $2,089. Both assets are down today. Both are under pressure. At first glance, an ordinary observer might think the crypto market is just experiencing a short-term dip. But if you look closely, the stories driving BTC and ETH are diverging in a meaningful way — and this could define the next phase of the crypto market in 2026. Current Bitcoin Narrative For many years, BTC prices moved almost in tandem with tech stocks and software ETFs. Investors often viewed it as a risk asset, closely tied to macro technological trends. That correlation is now clearly breaking down. Recently, BTC has decoupled from tech stocks. This shift has been driven by several macro factors: Rising geopolitical tensions ( for example, Iran) Accelerating AI adoption reshaping global tech flow and investment Institutional strategies viewing BTC as a macro hedge What does this mean? Bitcoin is transitioning into a macro asset — behaving more like gold than Nasdaq. The story of it being a store of value, long supported by optimistic BTC investors, is now evident in actual market data. Institutional flows confirm this trend: MicroStrategy and other buyers continue strategic accumulation. Recent large purchases include 4,871 BTC added by institutional strategies. Spot ETFs still see steady capital inflows. Technical indicators, such as the 7-day MACD on the weekly chart, are approaching a golden cross, a bullish signal for medium-term momentum. BTC is positioning itself as a risk hedge, a store of value, and a portfolio pillar. Current Ethereum Narrative Ethereum is heading in a completely different direction. ETH is not aiming to become gold. Instead, it positions itself as a payment layer for the global digital economy. It is increasingly seen as a more productive infrastructure rather than a passive store of value. Key points: The USDT supply on Ethereum has surpassed Tron. The world’s most popular stablecoin now primarily uses Ethereum as its storage base. Every USDT transaction on ETH requires gas fees, creating ongoing demand for ETH structure. Major institutions like BlackRock and Bitmine are accumulating ETH as an income-generating asset. By staking ETH, they earn rewards while maintaining exposure to upside potential. ETH derivatives have recently experienced net buying pressure — the first time since the 2023 bear market. This is a structural signal reflecting confidence in ETH’s long-term utility, not just short-term speculation. Essentially, ETH is viewed as a productive capital — an asset working for you while you hold it, unlike BTC, which is mainly stored for value preservation. Core Divergence BTC = Digital Gold: Store of value, macro risk hedge, portfolio anchor. ETH = Digital Infrastructure: Productive capital, payment layer, yield-generating holding, essential part of DeFi, stablecoins, and the growing digital economy. Both narratives are valid and can coexist. However, currently, the market prices them equally, selling both during downturns, which creates potential opportunities for informed investors to understand this structural difference. Market Performance Summary ETH 90-day performance: -32.74% ETH 30-day performance: +4.8% ETH has shown signs of recovery over the past 30 days, suggesting a potential turning point. But the key question is: is this a temporary bounce or the start of a new trend? Meanwhile, BTC continues to pursue its macro asset story, decoupled from tech stocks but still sensitive to institutional flows. Why This Matters Understanding the difference between BTC and ETH is crucial for portfolio strategies: Allocation Strategy: Investors might consider holding BTC for safety and long-term value, while using ETH for staking, DeFi, and other yield protocols. Risk Management: ETH’s productive role makes it more susceptible to various systemic risks (smart contract layers, DeFi applications), whereas BTC’s risks are mainly macro-related. Opportunity Recognition: When the market treats both assets equally, savvy investors can position asymmetrically, benefiting from ETH’s store of value story and BTC’s macro risk hedge simultaneously. Key Message: BTC and ETH are not the same type of asset, even if the market may treat them as such during short-term downturns. BTC protects wealth. ETH creates wealth. 90 days of losses may make ETH look weak, but its structural acceptance still tells a different story.
1
0
0
0
Katemin97

Katemin97

12 minutes ago
#GateSquareAprilPostingChallenge “Ethereum Divergence from Bitcoin” Extended Version Title: Bitcoin is called Digital Gold. Ethereum is called Digital Infrastructure. This is why this distinction could be more important than ever in 2026. Bitcoin is trading at $68,482. Ethereum is trading at $2,089. Both assets are down today. Both are under pressure. At a glance, an ordinary observer might think the crypto market is just experiencing a short-term correction. But if you look closely, the stories driving BTC and ETH are diverging in a meaningful way — and this could determine the next phase of the crypto market in 2026. Current Bitcoin Narrative For many years, BTC prices moved almost in tandem with tech stocks and software ETFs. Investors often viewed it as a risk asset, closely tied to macro technological trends. That correlation is now clearly breaking down. Recently, BTC has decoupled from tech stocks. This shift has been driven by several macro factors: Rising geopolitical tensions ( for example, Iran) Accelerating AI applications reshaping global tech and investment flows Institutional strategies viewing BTC as a macro hedge What does this mean? Bitcoin is transitioning into a macro asset — behaving more like gold than Nasdaq. The story of it being a store of value, long supported by optimistic BTC investors, is now reflected in real market data. Institutional flows confirm this trend: MicroStrategy and other buyers continue strategic accumulation. Recent large purchases include 4,871 BTC added by institutional strategies. Spot ETFs still see steady capital inflows. Technical indicators, such as the 7-day MACD on the weekly chart, are approaching a golden cross, signaling medium-term bullish momentum. BTC is positioning itself as a risk hedge, a store of value, and a portfolio pillar. Current Ethereum Narrative Ethereum is heading in a completely different direction. ETH is not aiming to become gold. Instead, it positions itself as a payment layer for the global digital economy. It is increasingly seen as a more productive infrastructure rather than a passive store of value. Key points: The USDT supply on Ethereum has surpassed Tron. The world’s most popular stablecoin now primarily uses Ethereum as its storage base. Every USDT transaction on ETH requires gas fees, creating ongoing demand for ETH structure. Major institutions like BlackRock and Bitmine are accumulating ETH as an income-generating asset. By staking ETH, they earn rewards while maintaining exposure to upside potential. ETH derivatives have recently experienced net buying pressure — the first time since the 2023 bear market. This is a structural signal reflecting confidence in ETH’s long-term utility, not just short-term speculation. Essentially, ETH is viewed as a productive capital — an asset working for you while you hold it, unlike BTC, which is mainly stored for value preservation. Core Divergence BTC = Digital Gold: Store of value, macro risk hedge, portfolio anchor. ETH = Digital Infrastructure: Productive capital, payment layer, yield-generating holding, essential part of DeFi, stablecoins, and the growing digital economy. Both narratives are valid and can coexist. However, currently, the market prices them equally, selling both during downturns, which creates potential opportunities for informed investors to understand this structural difference. Market Performance Summary ETH 90-day performance: -32.74% ETH 30-day performance: +4.8% ETH has shown signs of recovery over the past 30 days, suggesting a potential turning point. But the key question is: is this a temporary bounce or the start of a new trend? Meanwhile, BTC continues its macro asset story, decoupling from tech stocks but still sensitive to institutional flows. Why This Matters Understanding the difference between BTC and ETH is crucial for portfolio strategy: Allocation Strategy: Investors might consider holding BTC for safety and long-term value, while using ETH for staking, DeFi, and other yield protocols. Risk Management: ETH’s productive role makes it more susceptible to various systemic risks (smart contract layers, DeFi applications), whereas BTC’s risks are mainly macro-related. Opportunity Recognition: When the market treats both assets equally, savvy investors can position asymmetrically, benefiting from ETH’s productive story and BTC’s macro hedge simultaneously. Key Message: BTC and ETH are not the same type of asset, even if the market may treat them as such during short-term downturns. BTC protects wealth. ETH creates wealth. 90 days of losses may make ETH look weak, but its structural acceptance still tells a different story.
1
0
0
0
MaticHoleFiller

MaticHoleFiller

15 minutes ago
Featured sections Stocks to watch Data center Market overview Capital flow Virtual trading Client side   Yangtze Nonferrous Metals Network   In March, the lead price for Yangtze spot 1# moved out of the pattern of “weak stabilization after a one-way decline.” Throughout the month, it fluctuated and moved downward from the high of 16,775 yuan/ton, after a mid-month “cliff-like” sharp drop, and ended the month at 16,525 yuan/ton. The monthly average price was 16,635.23 yuan/ton, a slight decline of 11.36 yuan compared with the previous month. With bear sentiment dominating the market and overall sentiment pessimistic, and as the April wave of collective price hikes for electric two-wheelers hits, will demand for stocking lead-acid batteries explode and will lead prices see a turnaround? Lead’s latest price outlook, the link between electric two-wheeler price hikes and lead prices, and an analysis of the lead price trend in March 2026—understand it all in one article!   Macroeconomic factors affecting the market   In March 2026, the Yangtze spot 1# lead price’s “weak stabilization after a one-way decline” was mainly driven by dramatic turmoil in the international macro environment. The escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and the Fed’s “hawkish” shift jointly boosted the U.S. dollar and intensified global concerns about “stagflation without growth” and recession, causing capital to move out of risk assets such as industrial metals. Although domestic policy remains steady, it is difficult to offset this powerful external pressure. Macro headwinds concentrated and broke out in the middle-to-late part of March, triggering a “cliff-like” plunge in lead prices. Toward the end of the month, as geopolitical risk at the margin eased, the market entered a weak balance after headwinds were exhausted; however, due to the lack of upward drivers, the rebound lacked momentum, and overall it showed a relatively weak pattern led by macro factors.   Interpretation of the current status of the lead industry chain   At present, the lead industry chain is characterized by a layout of primary lead production increase, losses in recycled lead, and a recovery in demand, with supply and demand on both sides in a delicate balance. On the supply side, domestic primary lead smelters’ operating rates gradually recover to normal levels; some incremental production capacity lands smoothly, and output has increased compared with the earlier period. Recycled lead enterprises, however, generally face pressure from losses, with low willingness to operate; the industry’s overall operating rate is lower than the same period last year, and raw material supply is also relatively tight. At the same time, the de-stocking pace of lead ingot social inventory accelerates, providing some support for prices. On the demand side, driven by stocking demand for electric two-wheelers, as well as energy storage and battery demand related to automobiles, market demand shows a warming trend. Lead-acid battery exports have increased, but the growth rate has slowed somewhat. Coupled with a sharp rise in lithium battery prices, the cost-performance advantage of lead-acid batteries has become more prominent, and the pace of substitution has slowed. On the cost side, the Middle East geopolitical conflict drives up oil prices, directly raising energy costs in the lead smelting process, which provides rigid support for lead prices and further maintains the current delicate balance in the industry chain.   A wave of electric two-wheeler price hikes is coming—demand for lead-acid battery stocking surges   Starting April 1, leading electric two-wheeler brands including Yadea, AIMA, and Ninebot collectively raised prices. The price increases for complete vehicles range from 150–300 yuan, and the core drivers are threefold: first, battery costs have skyrocketed—lead-acid batteries account for 40%–55% of the cost of the entire vehicle; against the backdrop of the lead price pullback in March, recycled lead enterprises have continued to operate at losses, leading to tighter supply; in addition, the upgrade of the new national standard technology further raises the unit cost of each lead-acid battery. Second, the newly released supplementary provisions to the新版 electric bicycle safety technical standards took effect, adding multiple mandatory configurations, which also increases single-vehicle costs. Third, high dealer rebates from the first quarter have expired, and the related policies for the new quarter have not yet connected, causing dealer procurement costs to rise passively. Driven by price-hike expectations, dealers accelerate stocking, boosting the operating rate of lead-acid battery enterprises in the late March period, and also increasing lead ingot procurement demand, resulting in a phase of high levels.   Short-term outlook: lead price shows bottom support, but rebound momentum still needs observation   Core judgment: In April, lead prices will trade in a range of 16,400–16,800 yuan/ton, with strengthened bottom support. The rebound’s height depends on three main factors: the persistence of stocking demand for electric two-wheelers; whether terminal demand follows through after the price hikes. If April sales decline month-on-month by more than 15%, stocking demand may shrink quickly; the pace of capacity re-starts for recycled lead—if scrap battery prices fall or profit improves as lead prices rise, operating rates are expected to rise to 40%, increasing supply pressure; changes in macro sentiment—the Fed’s stance at its April policy meeting, the U.S. dollar index trend, and how the situation in the Middle East evolves directly affect risk appetite. Key support level: 16,400 yuan/ton (cost line). Resistance level: 16,800 yuan/ton (early-month high). Short-term trading suggestions: if prices pull back to below 16,450 yuan/ton, consider building a long position with a light allocation; stop-loss at 16,350 yuan/ton. If prices rebound to above 16,750 yuan/ton, reduce positions to guard against the risk of a drop after a surge.   (Note: personal views; the core viewpoints are based on publicly available information and market reasoning. Some parts of the text are organized using AI. The views above are for reference only and do not constitute a basis for entering the market.) Yangtze Nonferrous Metals Network Open a futures account on Sina’s large cooperative platform—safe, fast, and with reliable protection Massive information and precise interpretation—right on the Sina Finance APP Responsible editor: Li Tiemin
1
0
0
0