Cobra, the operator of the bitcoin.org domain, recently reminded the community that BTC developers outside of Bitcoin Core plan to introduce the BTC improvement proposal CTV through a user-activated soft fork (UASF) in 2025. According to a report by Bitcoin.com, Cobra issued a reminder on December 1st that some BTC developers plan to introduce CTV (CheckTemplateVerify) through UASF in 2025. Currently, developers outside of the core development team are working on the code and activation parameters, but not many people are paying attention to this. CTV, also known as BIP-119, is a soft fork proposal for BTC introduced by Jeremy Rubin, the founder of the BTC research organization Judica, in 2021. The purpose of this proposal is to add a new "contract/covenant" to the BTC network, similar to smart contracts on Ethereum (ETH). Rubin hopes that through the covenant, certain addresses can be whitelisted or blacklisted, and funds from cold or hardware wallets can only be withdrawn to another address under the control of the fund owner, or transactions can be automated to arrange the balance in the wallet to be exported on specific dates or multiple dates, bringing more programmability to BTC. Shinobi, a member of the BTC community, also believes that one of the most effective and influential benefits of CTV is to improve the scalability of people joining the Lightning Network. However, while receiving support, the BIP-119 proposal has also been criticized by multiple BTC experts. For example, BTC technical expert and co-founder of Blockstream, Adam Back, advocated a thorough review of BIP-119 in 2022. In addition, Khối writer Andreas Antonopoulos expressed concerns about the potential impact of BIP-119 in the same year, pointing out that the added functionality of the proposal allows developers to restrict the list of addresses that can send BTC in the future, but this makes certain BTC no longer fungible tokens and essentially creates a new category of BTC. Moreover, when users have the ability to blacklist certain addresses, governments and regulatory agencies are likely to intervene and start banning certain addresses, which would essentially create something similar to PayPal but with poor scalability, which is how you kill BTC. Currently, the BTC community still has controversies over BIP-119, with some believing that this improvement is valuable while others claim it as a desperate attempt. Therefore, whether BTC will really see this improvement next year is still uncertain.
Nội dung chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo, không phải là lời chào mời hay đề nghị. Không cung cấp tư vấn về đầu tư, thuế hoặc pháp lý. Xem Tuyên bố miễn trừ trách nhiệm để biết thêm thông tin về rủi ro.
BTC sẽ hard fork vào năm sau? Đề xuất BIP-119 gây tranh cãi là gì và có dự định tích hợp các tính năng tương tự hợp đồng thông minh
Cobra, the operator of the bitcoin.org domain, recently reminded the community that BTC developers outside of Bitcoin Core plan to introduce the BTC improvement proposal CTV through a user-activated soft fork (UASF) in 2025. According to a report by Bitcoin.com, Cobra issued a reminder on December 1st that some BTC developers plan to introduce CTV (CheckTemplateVerify) through UASF in 2025. Currently, developers outside of the core development team are working on the code and activation parameters, but not many people are paying attention to this. CTV, also known as BIP-119, is a soft fork proposal for BTC introduced by Jeremy Rubin, the founder of the BTC research organization Judica, in 2021. The purpose of this proposal is to add a new "contract/covenant" to the BTC network, similar to smart contracts on Ethereum (ETH). Rubin hopes that through the covenant, certain addresses can be whitelisted or blacklisted, and funds from cold or hardware wallets can only be withdrawn to another address under the control of the fund owner, or transactions can be automated to arrange the balance in the wallet to be exported on specific dates or multiple dates, bringing more programmability to BTC. Shinobi, a member of the BTC community, also believes that one of the most effective and influential benefits of CTV is to improve the scalability of people joining the Lightning Network. However, while receiving support, the BIP-119 proposal has also been criticized by multiple BTC experts. For example, BTC technical expert and co-founder of Blockstream, Adam Back, advocated a thorough review of BIP-119 in 2022. In addition, Khối writer Andreas Antonopoulos expressed concerns about the potential impact of BIP-119 in the same year, pointing out that the added functionality of the proposal allows developers to restrict the list of addresses that can send BTC in the future, but this makes certain BTC no longer fungible tokens and essentially creates a new category of BTC. Moreover, when users have the ability to blacklist certain addresses, governments and regulatory agencies are likely to intervene and start banning certain addresses, which would essentially create something similar to PayPal but with poor scalability, which is how you kill BTC. Currently, the BTC community still has controversies over BIP-119, with some believing that this improvement is valuable while others claim it as a desperate attempt. Therefore, whether BTC will really see this improvement next year is still uncertain.