In brief
- SEC Chair Paul Atkins told senators the agency may assert jurisdiction over the booming prediction market sector.
- Atkins said some prediction markets could qualify as securities depending on how they are structured and “worded.”
- The more hands-off CFTC has so far been the primary federal regulator of prediction market platforms.
SEC chair Paul Atkins said Thursday that the Wall Street regulator could soon involve itself in the regulation of prediction markets—a move that could have significant implications for the exploding sector.
During testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Atkins identified prediction markets as an industry that should potentially be overseen by both the SEC and its more hands-off sister agency, the commodities-focused CFTC. Up to now, the CFTC has been considered the default regulator for prediction markets.
“Prediction markets are exactly one thing where there’s overlapping jurisdiction potentially,” Atkins said, in response to a question from Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA). “That is a huge issue we’re focused on.”
“It’s mostly, at least currently, on the CFTC side,” the SEC chair continued. “But we need to be harmonized in the way we’re addressing these markets.”
When McCormick asked whether the SEC would need legislation passed by Congress to involve itself in regulating prediction markets, the agency chief indicated the agency is ready to move now.
“I think we have enough authority,” Atkins replied. “A security is a security regardless of how it is, and some of the nuance with prediction markets and the products depends on wording and what exactly is being done.”
It is as of yet unclear what exactly Atkins meant by the comment. _Decrypt _reached out to the SEC for clarification but did not immediately receive a response.
The SEC could, for instance, involve itself in prediction markets tracking assets already regulated as securities, such as stocks. Security futures—derivatives contracts that track the price of individual stocks and narrow-based securities indexes—are already jointly regulated by the CFTC and SEC.
Prediction markets enable their users to wager on the outcome of virtually anything—from elections, sports, and cultural events to cryptocurrency and stock market prices. The industry has more than quadrupled in size last year, emerging as a $63.5 billion market barely two years after beginning operation in the United States. The sector’s two top players, Kalshi and Polymarket, have surged in recent months to massive valuations of $11 billion and $9 billion, respectively.
Since their explosion last year, prediction market companies have enjoyed extremely hands-off regulation by the CFTC, which relies heavily on registered platforms to self-regulate.
State regulators have in recent months challenged that lax oversight, arguing in numerous lawsuits that sports-related event contracts—which constitute the overwhelming majority of prediction markets’ business—are in fact unlicensed sports betting operations under state jurisdiction.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory control over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working together with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority for Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and provide uniform national regulation, reducing the influence of state-level gambling laws.
CryptoCity4h ago
Ruling sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement efforts and pushes to take regulatory control of prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working together with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi’s prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports-event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the influence of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity7h ago
Sports betting event contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal level, arguing that contracts for sports events are financial derivatives. If the court backs this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and unify nationwide regulation, reducing the influence of state and local gambling laws.
CryptoCity10h ago
Polymarket link briefly appeared in Google News before being removed; Google said it was an error caused by a mistaken push
On April 12, the prediction market Polymarket briefly appeared in Google News search results, but was then removed. Google said this was an error and said it will no longer display it. The platform has been proactively integrated with media and has already partnered with Google and the X platform.
GateNews12h ago
Robinhood, concerned about insider trading restrictions, limits some prediction market contracts
Robinhood takes a cautious approach in its prediction market business, excluding “market mentions” contracts that could easily trigger manipulation risks, and emphasizing that it only offers regulated event contracts to protect customer interests. Recent insider trading incidents have intensified industry concerns, and to mitigate risk, Robinhood partners with regulated platforms to ensure user identity verification.
GateNews13h ago
Sports-betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory authority over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi’s prediction markets from local governments to the federal government, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court backs this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and create uniform nationwide oversight, reducing the impact of state-level wagering laws.
CryptoCity13h ago
