2026-01-07 18:29:58

Regarding the market timing for token burns, there is an interesting logic: it is more cost-effective to perform burns during a price decline rather than during a price surge. The economic effects of burning at lower prices are more significant and can more effectively support long-term value. This approach is worth serious consideration for Web3 project teams.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MindsetExpander

· 01-08 02:09

The low-level destruction move is indeed brilliant, similar to the bottom-fishing logic, doing bigger things with the same amount of money.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 01-07 18:58

The logic of low-level burning is indeed brilliant, it's like picking up cheap coins to burn...

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-07 18:52

The low-level destruction logic sounds comfortable, but how many projects actually dare to do it? It sounds good, but in the end, isn't it just more cutting?

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 01-07 18:48

nah, this is just governance theater. burning at lows is exactly what they *want* you to think... meanwhile the real play is watching which devs actually have skin in the game vs who's just cosmetic-maxing their tokenomics. protocol darwinism doesn't care about your burn schedule

Reply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-07 18:43

Low-level smashing and burning? Sounds like you're just looking for an excuse to buy the dip haha

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian