I cashed in early during the AVAX GameFi boom, but that's just being in the right place at the right time—not proof the model actually works. Looking back, most of those projects had no structural foundation for longevity. They seemed reasonable when times were good, but couldn't survive once conditions shifted.
What really grabbed me about Capysword isn't the game itself. It's the thinking behind it. The founder's approach to game design and tokenomics shows something different—a focus on sustainable mechanics rather than quick extraction. That's rare in this space.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWatcher
· 01-06 23:05
NGL, I did make some money early on, but it was really mostly luck... Looking at those projects now, they're just paper-thin, and they all collapse in a bear market.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 01-04 06:04
The early AVAX wave indeed made a profit, but that was just because the launch window was well-timed... Most projects haven't even considered escape velocity, and they immediately crash when the bear market hits.
Capysword's tokenomics design is actually quite thoughtful, not the kind of quick pump-and-dump scheme. The consideration of Bollinger Band pressure levels is noticeably more in-depth.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 01-03 23:58
lmao "sustainable mechanics" is just what everyone claims before the governance attack vectors start showing up. capysword's tokenomics look prettier on paper than most, sure, but let's see if they actually withstand the margin of disruption when incentives flip. protocol darwinism doesn't care about intent.
Reply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 01-03 23:58
ngl The early AVAX wave did make some profit, but that was just good luck... The real test revealed the truth. The idea behind Capysword is indeed different; finally, I see someone seriously working on tokenomics.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-03 23:38
Early AVAX Napo indeed made a profit, but honestly, luck played a big role. I am optimistic about the Capysword approach; unlike those projects that only think about making a quick profit and then running away.
I cashed in early during the AVAX GameFi boom, but that's just being in the right place at the right time—not proof the model actually works. Looking back, most of those projects had no structural foundation for longevity. They seemed reasonable when times were good, but couldn't survive once conditions shifted.
What really grabbed me about Capysword isn't the game itself. It's the thinking behind it. The founder's approach to game design and tokenomics shows something different—a focus on sustainable mechanics rather than quick extraction. That's rare in this space.