2026-01-03 19:23:03

Two similar bonk token projects have appeared on the market. Which one is more competitive? Both are vying for community attention, but their core mechanisms and ecosystem operation ideas seem to differ. From the perspectives of token design, liquidity support, and community governance, which one stands out more? Want to hear insights from knowledgeable people about this, and understand where the development potential differences lie between these parallel projects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FreeMinter

· 01-06 18:47

Copy-pasted projects, who the hell cares? It's all about who gets listed on the exchange first to pump the price.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-04 20:10

Both projects are just schemes to scam quick profits, there's no difference.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 01-03 19:40

Haha, both Bonk are competing fiercely. Whoever wins, I'll buy whoever wins.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-03 19:35

Two bonks? Alright, here we go again with the copy-paste show. Let's see who runs away first.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-03 19:28

Two bonk? Bro, I've never heard of it. What kind of thing is this? --- Who has more liquidity wins, everything else is nonsense, and there's no point in ecological governance. --- To be honest, these parallel projects have little prospect; it's just the same old scam with a different shell. --- It depends on who has more Twitter followers; the crypto world is that straightforward. --- No matter how good the token design is, if no one promotes it, it's useless; it all depends on how KOLs choose sides.

View OriginalReply0