When it comes to handling epidemics, governments typically throw massive budgets at research institutions with limited transparency. Take long COVID as an example: the NIH has received $1.5 billion in funding specifically aimed at solving it, yet we've seen virtually zero meaningful breakthroughs from that investment. The gap between money spent and actual results raises serious questions about how public health research funds are really being allocated and whether the traditional "ivory tower" approach to science is delivering what taxpayers actually need.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostWalletSleuth
· 9h ago
15 billion invested and nothing came out, this is the common problem of traditional scientific research.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 9h ago
Investing 1.5 billion still hasn't shown any movement. This is really outrageous, and I truly can't understand where the money has gone.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadow
· 10h ago
15 billion invested and this is it? It feels like the medical industry is really in a downward spiral, there's no hope anymore.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 10h ago
Uh, 1.5 billion dollars just like that? Truly outrageous, feels like it's all been fed to the dogs.
---
I've long complained about the dead-end of long COVID projects. Where did the money go?
---
Another black hole in scientific research, brothers, taxpayer’s hard-earned money.
---
NFT project transparency is higher than NIH’s. Can you believe it?
---
Wait, are these numbers real? 1.5 billion USD with zero progress? I might need to look into it...
---
Typical ivory tower tactics, burning money to extend life—really skilled at that.
---
And they still talk about breakthroughs? That’s hilarious.
---
Humans just love to throw money around to show off and then waste it all without limits.
---
So when will Web3 decentralization research come to save the day?
---
That’s why I trust DAO funding over the government’s approach.
When it comes to handling epidemics, governments typically throw massive budgets at research institutions with limited transparency. Take long COVID as an example: the NIH has received $1.5 billion in funding specifically aimed at solving it, yet we've seen virtually zero meaningful breakthroughs from that investment. The gap between money spent and actual results raises serious questions about how public health research funds are really being allocated and whether the traditional "ivory tower" approach to science is delivering what taxpayers actually need.