When I first looked at Reya's token issuance data, like most people, I initially focused on the surface numbers.
150M FDV, 8 billion circulating supply, 160M sold. It looks like a typical token sale, nothing special.
But I didn't close the page; instead, I turned to the technical documentation. That's where the real interest lies.
Based on Rollup architecture, delegated ordering mechanisms, ZK finality... these technical choices reveal the real problems Reya aims to solve. It's not about hype, but practical thinking on scaling solutions. Many projects have impressive fundraising data, but their technical architecture is mediocre. Reya, on the other hand, at first glance, the fundraising scale may seem unremarkable, but it hides unexpected technical depth. That's why conclusions based solely on FDV and supply are insufficient.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StableGenius
· 12-29 18:49
ngl most people will baghold this anyway regardless of the tech, but yeah the delegation sequencing bit actually checks out empirically speaking
Reply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 12-29 18:36
Wow, finally someone is looking at projects this way. Most people are really just focusing on FDV and supply, and not paying attention to the tech stack at all.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 12-29 18:29
This guy really dove in deep. I just like people who aren't fooled by surface data.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 12-29 18:28
Damn, another project whose fundraising numbers are misleading. But this time, it seems like there's really something; I checked the tech stack, and it's indeed different.
When I first looked at Reya's token issuance data, like most people, I initially focused on the surface numbers.
150M FDV, 8 billion circulating supply, 160M sold. It looks like a typical token sale, nothing special.
But I didn't close the page; instead, I turned to the technical documentation. That's where the real interest lies.
Based on Rollup architecture, delegated ordering mechanisms, ZK finality... these technical choices reveal the real problems Reya aims to solve. It's not about hype, but practical thinking on scaling solutions. Many projects have impressive fundraising data, but their technical architecture is mediocre. Reya, on the other hand, at first glance, the fundraising scale may seem unremarkable, but it hides unexpected technical depth. That's why conclusions based solely on FDV and supply are insufficient.