Recently, I noticed a good idea: instead of building an all-powerful super AI agent, it's better to have multiple AI agents each doing their own job and focusing on their areas of expertise, then coordinating within the same platform. This distributed agent architecture is indeed more flexible. Each agent does its own thing, and through mechanized collaboration, completes complex tasks. Compared to a centralized single intelligent entity, the advantages are quite apparent.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 2025-12-31 13:06
Alright, I've already seen this approach long ago. Professional division of labor is really more reliable than a unified system.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 2025-12-31 06:49
Distributed sounds good, but in the end there will still be a centralized coordinator, right? The essence hasn't changed; it's just a different name.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 2025-12-29 21:56
It's the same distributed proxy setup again, sounding just like my old fantasies about leverage—perfect in theory, but in reality, one link blows up and the entire chain collapses.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 2025-12-28 19:55
Wow, this idea is really impressive. Distributed governance is much better than relying on a single brain.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 2025-12-28 19:53
This idea is actually just the microservices architecture with a different disguise. However, applying it to AI does have some merit. When a monolithic AI is about to collapse, having multiple proxies can still help drag it out.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 2025-12-28 19:37
Hmm... This approach looks good, but I have to say—whether single-point breakthroughs and modular collaboration can work depends on how they are implemented. Otherwise, it becomes a distributed low-efficiency architecture.
Recently, I noticed a good idea: instead of building an all-powerful super AI agent, it's better to have multiple AI agents each doing their own job and focusing on their areas of expertise, then coordinating within the same platform. This distributed agent architecture is indeed more flexible. Each agent does its own thing, and through mechanized collaboration, completes complex tasks. Compared to a centralized single intelligent entity, the advantages are quite apparent.