A thought-provoking question about monetary policy: if governments can create unlimited currency through the printing press, what's the actual purpose of tax collection? This paradox sits at the heart of modern fiscal debates. The logic seems contradictory—on one hand, authorities claim money supply management requires taxation to control inflation and fund services. On the other hand, unlimited money printing remains technically possible without raising taxes. It's a classic tension between theoretical monetary capacity and actual policy constraints. Whether you view this through the lens of macroeconomic stability, government fiscal discipline, or currency debasement, the contradiction deserves serious examination. This kind of questioning is precisely why many crypto advocates argue for systems with predictable, algorithm-driven monetary policies instead of centralized discretion.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityJanitor
· 12-28 05:01
As soon as the printing press starts, it can create money. So isn't collecting taxes pointless? I really find the government's logic more and more absurd the more I think about it. No wonder everyone is turning to crypto.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 12-27 16:21
If the printing press is so awesome, why do we still need to pay taxes? I've thought about this for a long time... Basically, it's inflation. Keep printing money and the system will collapse. No wonder everyone is into cryptocurrencies now.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 12-27 12:09
Once the printing press starts, what’s the point of taxes? This question hits the soft spot of traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 12-27 03:36
As soon as the printing press starts, it can create unlimited coins. Isn't that just a cover for taxes... This logic is really brilliant, no wonder more and more people are turning to crypto.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 12-26 16:51
Once the printing press starts, what's the point of taxes? That's a really sharp question... But on the other hand, if this system is played out completely, it would be Zimbabwe's fate.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictim
· 12-26 16:45
Damn, this question hits the nail on the head. Taxation is essentially just a pretext for power plunder.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 12-26 16:39
ngl this question is really on point... The government’s printing press keeps running, so why should we still pay taxes? The traditional financial logic has indeed collapsed.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 12-26 16:37
This question is asked perfectly. To put it simply, if printing money could solve everything, then what's the point of taxes? It's just a joke.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 12-26 16:37
The printing press never stops, and you still have to pay taxes? Now that's the biggest lie.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 12-26 16:29
Taxation is just a cover; the printing press is the real truth haha
A thought-provoking question about monetary policy: if governments can create unlimited currency through the printing press, what's the actual purpose of tax collection? This paradox sits at the heart of modern fiscal debates. The logic seems contradictory—on one hand, authorities claim money supply management requires taxation to control inflation and fund services. On the other hand, unlimited money printing remains technically possible without raising taxes. It's a classic tension between theoretical monetary capacity and actual policy constraints. Whether you view this through the lens of macroeconomic stability, government fiscal discipline, or currency debasement, the contradiction deserves serious examination. This kind of questioning is precisely why many crypto advocates argue for systems with predictable, algorithm-driven monetary policies instead of centralized discretion.