February 14 News, Virginia is advancing a regulatory bill targeting cryptocurrency ATMs. The bill has been approved by the state Senate and House of Delegates and is now awaiting the governor’s signature. Once enacted, it will establish uniform compliance standards for self-service terminal operators across the state and provide consumers with more systematic fraud protection.
According to the bill, operators must complete registration and licensing processes, submit periodic reports, and comply with fee cap requirements. Machines are no longer allowed to promote themselves as “ATMs” or use any language implying cash withdrawal. The new regulations will also set daily and monthly transaction limits, implement a 48-hour freeze period for new users to facilitate refunds in case of suspected fraud, and require all transactions to undergo identity verification. Clear risk warnings must be posted next to the devices.
The bill was introduced by State Delegate Michelle Maldonado. She stated that the direct reason for pushing the legislation was multiple scam cases in the state, including an incident in southwestern Virginia where a resident lost about $15,000 using such terminals, as well as similar cases in Fairfax County. She pointed out that these devices resemble traditional ATMs, which can easily cause misunderstandings; users are not withdrawing cash but converting cash into digital assets and transferring them to domestic or foreign platforms, often induced by scammers.
Maldonado also mentioned common scams such as impersonating law enforcement, technical support, emotional scams, and debt threats. She cited data indicating that in some parts of the U.S., single losses from such schemes have reached as high as $250,000. The bill therefore calls for establishing refund channels, limiting transaction fees, and strengthening disclosure obligations.
Virginia is not an isolated case. By 2025, about 17 U.S. states have enacted protective regulations against cryptocurrency ATM scams, mainly focusing on transaction limits and on-site warnings. South Carolina’s Beaufort County law enforcement officer Eric Cardin stated that many funds are quickly transferred to countries that do not cooperate with investigations, making recovery extremely difficult. The new regulations are seen as an important step in raising public awareness and reducing scam opportunities.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
The SEC’s approval of some crypto enforcement cases is unproductive; the $2.3 billion fine didn’t protect investors
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently approved some cryptocurrency enforcement actions that have not harmed investors, and is shifting its focus to substantive harmful conduct such as fraud and market manipulation. SEC Chair Atkins emphasized reallocating resources, reducing the overall number of enforcement actions, to strengthen the effectiveness of investor protection.
MarketWhisper6m ago
Ripple report: 8 African countries advance crypto regulation, with South Africa leading the stablecoin space
Ripple reports that about 8 countries in Africa have established cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks, driving high adoption rates due to demand for remittances and inadequate financial infrastructure. Regulation is more mature in South Africa and Mauritius, while Nigeria and Kenya are still developing. Stablecoins are gradually shifting from speculation to business use, enhancing the potential for integrating financial systems.
MarketWhisper44m ago
Strengthen the bank-tax interaction! China encourages banks to use blockchain, but ordinary people trading coins and engaging in tokenization are all illegal.
The Chinese government encourages banks to use blockchain technology to strengthen “bank-tax interactions,” improve the financing environment for small and medium-sized enterprises, while fully banning private cryptocurrency trading and mining. It treats stablecoins and tokenization as illegal activities, showing clear policy boundaries and emphasizing official oversight and financial security.
CryptoCity54m ago
Does the party fear secret mobilization? Jack Dorsey: China demands that Apple remove Bitchat, a decentralized communications app
Apple removed the decentralized communications app Bitchat from app stores due to China’s regulatory requirements. Because its Bluetooth and mesh network features were deemed to carry a risk of social mobilization, it was found to violate China’s Cybersecurity Law. Bitchat’s decentralized architecture makes it difficult for the government to regulate, and it has played a role in protests in multiple countries. The app can still be used outside China, and its downloads have continued to increase recently.
CryptoCity1h ago
FDIC moves to regulate stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act
The FDIC has proposed new regulations for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act, outlining standards for reserves, redemption, and risk management. While backing for stablecoins will be insured, holders will not receive direct protection. The FDIC invites public feedback for the next 60 days.
Cointelegraph2h ago
FDIC issues stablecoin rollout guidance, with banks strictly controlling reserves and redemptions
The U.S. FDIC approved a proposal on April 7 to establish a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, covering four main compliance requirements: reserves, redemptions, capital, and risk management. The proposal is intended to improve stablecoin compliance and bring stablecoins into the banking system, ensuring that stablecoin holders can redeem at par. However, stablecoins are not protected by federal deposit insurance. The proposal is currently in the public comment period.
MarketWhisper2h ago
