On February 12, it was reported that in 2026, the American Bankers Association (ABA) officially sent a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), demanding an immediate halt to the review of national bank charters for multiple cryptocurrency companies, including Ripple, Circle, and other related applicants. This move is seen as a strong countermeasure by the traditional American banking system against the expansion of the digital asset sector.
In the letter, the ABA stated that until Congress completes a regulatory framework for crypto finance, the OCC should not continue processing these applications at the traditional banking approval pace. The association emphasized that regulators must thoroughly assess applicants’ compliance responsibilities, capital structures, and potential systemic risks before issuing any charters.
One of the contentious issues is the GENIUS Act. The ABA criticized the OCC for tying charter approvals to this bill, which still requires several federal agencies to complete supporting regulations, and full implementation could take years. The ABA is concerned that issuing licenses prematurely, before the regulatory system is fully developed, could increase bankruptcy and liquidity risks.
Currently, Ripple’s application is the most closely watched. The company previously received conditional approval from the OCC, which was seen as a step away from full licensing. This development has triggered strong opposition from the ABA. Additionally, World Liberty Financial has also applied to become a federally chartered national trust bank, sparking controversy in political circles.
Besides these companies, Circle, BitGo, Paxos, and Laser Digital, a subsidiary of Nomura Securities, have also been mentioned as relevant cases. The ABA also warned that some crypto institutions might bypass restrictions on interest income outlined in the GENIUS Act through affiliated platforms, creating regulatory arbitrage.
This incident indicates that the battle between the US crypto finance sector and the traditional banking system is escalating. As legislative and regulatory processes continue to advance, whether the OCC will adjust its review pace will directly impact the institutionalization of the US digital asset industry.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
A CEX co-founder donates $5.4 million to the UK’s Reform UK party
A CEX co-founder, Ben Delo, donated $5.4 million to the Reform UK party, and the donation took place before new UK regulations came into effect. Delo was previously fined $10 million for violating anti–money laundering compliance and received a pardon from Donald Trump. Reform UK positions itself as a pro-cryptocurrency political party and is currently facing a pause order on crypto donations. After relocating to the UK, Delo plans to be exempt from donation limits.
GateNews16m ago
Korea’s ruling party proposes the “Basic Act on Digital Assets”: stablecoins are regulated like banks, and RWA tokenization is included in the Capital Markets Act
The Democratic Party of Korea proposed a draft of the “Digital Asset Basic Act,” planning to bring stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets into existing financial regulations, making it the first economy in Asia to comprehensively regulate digital assets. The draft sets up a tough stablecoin licensing mechanism and a requirement under the Capital Markets Act for RWA tokenization, and also discusses controversies over stablecoin issuance rights, which may later advance to the end of 2026 to establish a complete regulatory framework.
ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago
SEC Crypto Safe Harbor Proposal Submitted for Review! Eligible crypto projects can begin operations without registration
U.S. SEC Chair Paul Atkins confirmed that the “safe harbor” framework for cryptocurrencies has been submitted to the White House for review. The proposal includes exemptions for new offerings and investment contracts to encourage regulation and innovation in digital assets. This has sparked enthusiastic debate in the financial industry and among cryptocurrency advocates, and going forward it will aim to strike a balance between protecting investors and promoting innovation.
CryptoCity1h ago
Multiple U.S. law enforcement agencies oppose the DeFi developer protection provisions in the Senate’s crypto bill
Multiple U.S. law enforcement groups oppose the provisions in the Senate's crypto market structure bill that protect DeFi developers, arguing that it would weaken the government's ability to combat financial crime. The bill's proposed amendments have triggered a bipartisan rift, and it remains unclear whether it can move forward in the future.
GateNews1h ago
The Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority issues token issuance guidelines, clarifying the regulatory framework for stablecoins and RWA
Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has issued virtual asset issuance guidelines, clearly outlining the design and distribution of stablecoins and real-world asset tokens. Token issuance is divided into three categories, providing market participants with a reference by improving transparency and regulatory certainty. These guidelines are an interpretation of existing rules, not new regulations.
GateNews1h ago
New US FDIC rule! Stablecoin reserves face strict requirements and do not receive the $250k deposit insurance coverage per person
The U.S. FDIC has rolled out a regulatory framework for stablecoins, requiring 1:1 reserves, liquidity, and a redemption deadline within two days. The bill does not apply deposit insurance and is intended to ensure stability in the financial system. The FDIC clearly sets capital requirements and restrictions on returns, and clarifies the safety and compliance of stablecoins. This proposal is currently in the public comment period.
CryptoCity2h ago
