Is BNB Chain surpassing Ethereum? A structural shift in the EVM adoption trend is emerging by 2025

BNB1,08%
ETH6,53%
SEI8,34%

In the second half of 2025, the competitive focus within the EVM ecosystem is undergoing subtle yet crucial changes. The latest on-chain data indicates that the battle for EVM dominance is no longer primarily driven by token prices or short-term narratives, but is gradually shifting towards genuine user engagement and retention capabilities. Against this backdrop, BNB Chain has performed particularly well, quietly establishing an advantage as it moves toward 2026.

According to data disclosed by Nansen on the X platform, since July 2025, BNB Chain has consistently led other EVM chains in active addresses and has maintained high levels over the long term. Unlike many EVM chains that rely on episodic surges, BNB Chain exhibits stable and continuous usage characteristics, making it more akin to “everyday infrastructure” rather than a speculative tool.

The core driver of this trend stems from retail users’ high-frequency usage, low transaction fees, and deep integration with mainstream entry points like Gate, which align user pathways. This synergy lowers the barrier for new users and increases the repeat rate of on-chain interactions. In contrast, while Base experienced a rapid rise in activity, it lacked sustainability, with transaction behaviors more driven by incentives rather than genuine demand.

Overall, Ethereum still dominates in settlement volume and total transaction fees, but compared to its historical highs, its fee revenue has significantly declined. Currently, Ethereum functions more as a high-value settlement layer rather than a high-frequency interaction network. BNB Chain, on the other hand, leads comprehensively in active addresses and transaction counts, demonstrating stronger user stickiness.

On-chain data for Polygon and Sei Network show clear event-driven characteristics, with significant fluctuations in activity and no stable usage curve yet. This sharply contrasts with BNB Chain’s sustained high activity with low volatility, further reinforcing its structural advantages.

Looking ahead to 2026, the core competitive variables within the EVM ecosystem will no longer be short-term growth peaks but rather user retention and real-world application scenarios. As regulatory environments become clearer and applications in payments, gaming, and social media continue to land, those capable of supporting long-term, stable user activity are likely to become the next layer-one winners.

At this stage, BNB Chain is proving with data that the future of EVM may not belong to the hottest narratives but to the chains most frequently used.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

BlackRock charges an 18% commission on staking rewards for its Ethereum staking ETF; multiple experts assess costs and risks

BlackRock’s iShares Staked Ethereum Trust launched in March under its brand, with a management fee of 0.25% and a staking-reward commission of 18%. Industry insiders believe the commission includes multiple costs, and it may decrease in the future. Some people question whether such a high fee is justified, especially when comparing it to staking rates for retail investors.

GateNews17m ago

Ethereum falls below $2,200, with the 24-hour gain narrowing to 6.1%

Gate News update, April 8, market data shows that Ethereum fell below the $2,200 mark, and the 24-hour gain narrowed to 6.1%.

GateNews1h ago

ETH drops 0.85% in 15 minutes: ETF inflows weaken and large holders cut positions, triggering spot selling pressure

2026-04-08 14:30 to 14:45 (UTC), the ETH spot market saw a rapid pullback, with the return rate recording -0.85%. The candlestick price range fluctuated between 2202.51 and 2227.59 USDT, with a swing amplitude of 1.13%. During this period, trading volume rose by about 10% versus the previous hour on a quarter-hour basis, short-term market volatility intensified, and mainstream investor attention noticeably increased. The main driving force behind this unusual move is that the ETF capital inflow momentum, which was strong on April 6, significantly weakened on April 8; institutions and some of the capital that had flowed in earlier chose to realize profits in the spot market, bringing concentrated selling.

GateNews1h ago

ETH 跌破 2200 USDT

Gate News bot 消息,Gate 行情显示,ETH 跌破 2200 USDT,现价 2198.15 USDT。

CryptoRadar1h ago

Ethereum Foundation Sells 416.67 ETH for $933,340 DAI

Gate News message, the Ethereum Foundation has sold 416.67 ETH in exchange for $933,340 DAI. The foundation continues to hold additional ETH holdings.

GateNews2h ago

ETH drops 1.11% in 15 minutes: Large-holder funds cluster into exchanges, triggering sell pressure to take the lead

Between 13:30 and 13:45 (UTC) on 2026-04-08, the ETH price fell from 2265.79 USDT to 2234.72 USDT within 15 minutes, with a range of 1.37%. The candlestick return rate was -1.11%. The unusual downside move drew widespread attention from the market. Short-term volatility was significantly higher than in the surrounding periods, reflecting that trading sentiment was disrupted and driven by sudden dominant factors, and liquidity risk intensified. The main driving force behind this anomaly was a large-scale, synchronized transfer of whale funds into trading platforms. On-chain data shows four transfers with each amount exceeding 10k ETH, and exchange inflows

GateNews2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments