How is the classic Solbiscuit project? The developers spent several months refining it, and core team members hold a 1% share. Interestingly, the market has instead poured funds into the emerging star, pushing its valuation to 2 million. Meanwhile, those who are truly dedicated to their work are only sitting at a 250,000 valuation. This difference is quite significant—is the market being misled or biased?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RiddleMaster
· 01-07 20:06
The market just loves this, hype > technology, always the truth. Solbiscuit's low circulating supply is the real way to go.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 01-06 12:46
According to the tokenomics model in the white paper, this is a typical market failure caused by information asymmetry. Solbiscuit's 1% core holding structure actually exposes the problem of excessive centralization of governance rights, and the fact that the emerging project can reach a valuation of 2 million precisely indicates that retail investors prefer a more decentralized distributed model. It is worth noting that this phenomenon has repeatedly appeared in various DAO experiments—misaligned incentive mechanisms lead to those who do real work becoming mere spectators. I have to ask, what is the voting turnout for governance proposals on Solbiscuit?
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 01-06 04:54
The market is so magical, working hard is actually overlooked, while scam coins can take off. Truly amazing.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficer
· 01-06 04:48
ngl this screams capital allocation failure more than anything. empirically speaking, the data suggests we're watching decentralization theater in real time—where actual work gets punished and hype cycles win 🤓
the 1% core holder thing is... honestly kinda sus from a governance efficiency standpoint. doesn't surprise me market went elsewhere tbh
Reply0
AirdropHunter007
· 01-06 04:45
This is the crypto world—product developers can't earn as much as hype creators, and it's always like this.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 01-06 04:39
This is the crypto world—those with stories often lack funds, while meme coins are praised to the skies. Are those guys at Solbiscuit too honest?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 01-06 04:38
Haha, this is the crypto world. The ones you put your heart into are the ones nobody wants.
How is the classic Solbiscuit project? The developers spent several months refining it, and core team members hold a 1% share. Interestingly, the market has instead poured funds into the emerging star, pushing its valuation to 2 million. Meanwhile, those who are truly dedicated to their work are only sitting at a 250,000 valuation. This difference is quite significant—is the market being misled or biased?