Recently, discussions about various consumption subsidies have been very popular. Many people see that the new policies cover three major categories: digital products, home appliances, and automobiles, and their first reaction is to make a move. But as someone who has been immersed in the crypto market for many years and has seen countless "benefit trap" schemes, I need to give everyone a warning—there are hidden tricks in this wave of operations that are more sophisticated than some project pump-and-dump tactics.



Let's look at two more obvious issues first. Regarding new energy vehicles, the purchase tax will be fully exempted until 2025, saving up to 30,000 yuan, but in 2026, it will be cut in half to 15,000 yuan. For consumers who do not have an old car to trade in and are buying a new one directly, this effectively forces them to pay an extra 15,000 yuan—adding a hidden 5% cost on a 300,000 yuan car. This tactic is somewhat similar to sudden policy changes in the crypto market—before the market can react, the good news turns into bad news.

The digital products side is even more covert. Previously, when subsidies were available, new devices hardly saw any price drops; without subsidies, there were discounts of several hundred yuan through promotional activities. Now, with subsidies, consumers can only pay the official website price, and the original discount space has been swallowed by merchants. For models under 6,000 yuan, choosing the national subsidy results in profits directly going to retail channels. This kind of harvesting method is even more hidden than exchange fees—it appears to subsidize consumers, but in reality, it is a disguised price increase.

From a market analysis perspective, these policies are essentially short-term stimulative tools. The effect of stimulation is often very short-lived. Once subsidies gradually phase out or shrink, consumers will have to accept a new pricing system. Those who miss the first wave are usually the ones with the highest costs. This logic is similar to certain crypto project fundraising stages—early participants profit, while latecomers face the risk of following the trend. Think carefully about this before deciding whether to make a move; it’s much more rational than blindly rushing in.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokeBeansvip
· 3h ago
Haha, I told you, this is just like the financing rounds of certain coins, all the same套路 It's another "first come, first served" situation, later ones are all韭菜 Merchants profit from the差价, platforms profit from the差价, and in the end consumers still think they got subsidies, truly incredible By 2026, subsidies will be cut in half, and someone will regret it then. But this is even more straightforward than rug pulls in the crypto world The national subsidy thing is basically just harvesting options; once the time limit hits, they immediately change their stance Early participants are laughing, while later ones are just taking the fall. I've seen this logic too many times in the crypto圈 It's even more ruthless in digital products; under the guise of subsidies, prices actually rise. I need to learn this商家手法 Before buying a car, you need to calculate carefully, don’t be blinded by a 30,000 discount, the pitfalls are even bigger later
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperervip
· 01-05 01:50
It's the same old "policy benefits" trick, I've seen through it long ago. Subsidies are like airdrops in the crypto world—look good on the surface but actually just being exploited for free.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTopsvip
· 01-05 01:50
It's the same old story, policy benefits are always the breeding ground for retail investors Early investors make money, later ones take over, isn't this just a replica of the financing rounds? Subsidies, merchants have already calculated the costs long ago Wait, isn't this logic the same as the "policy bottom" meme in the crypto world In 2026, subsidies will be cut in half, and then Party A and Party B will start arguing again The funniest thing about digital products is that it seems like transaction fees are being cut on exchanges Policy-driven tools, in simple terms, are just new ways to cut retail investors' throats Chasing the trend is always the most expensive choice Which project hasn't played this game before? It feels like watching a familiar "pump and dump" script You can participate, but you need to think clearly about which relay you are in line to take
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdropvip
· 01-05 01:30
It's the same old trick, just like the funding rounds back in the day haha
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 01-05 01:30
ngl this subsidy playbook is basically the same extraction mechanism we saw in 2021 altseason—early adopters win, late majority absorbs the friction costs. classic adoption curve dynamics applied to consumer policy.
Reply0
SelfStakingvip
· 01-05 01:27
It's the same trick again—subsidies turn into a way to harvest retail investors, just like during the coin circle's IDO phase.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt