🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Having been involved in the DeFi space for many years, I’ve seen countless crypto schemes that boast grandiosity but ultimately end in failure. However, the UNI token burn of 100 million tokens is different—this time, it’s serious. The once-dormant leading DEX is finally showing signs of awakening.
When it comes to UNI, the most common expression among long-term holders is helplessness. As the absolute leader of a certain DEX, its daily fee revenue piles up, trading volume remains robust, yet the token price is eerily stable as if under a paralysis spell, earning it the nickname "the despair valley of value investing in the crypto world." The most painful question is: "Besides voting, what else can you expect from holding this token?" This awkward situation only started to turn around once the burn plan was officially launched.
For newcomers, it’s important to understand that token burning is not a routine marketing tactic in the crypto world. This move by UNI reflects genuine economic logic. The treasury of a certain DEX has long held a large reserve of tokens, and the market has been worried that this could become a potential selling pressure, one of the hidden factors preventing the price from rising. This time, burning 100 million tokens is not symbolic—this amount constitutes a significant portion of the total circulating supply, effectively removing a chunk of market "chips" permanently.
To put it simply: originally, ten people shared one pie; now, with two fewer people, the remaining eight share the same pie, instantly reversing the supply-demand relationship. This straightforward "reducing circulation" approach is obviously more convincing than mere "ecosystem upgrades," and it’s akin to installing a spring mechanism in the token price—any slight market sentiment loosening could trigger a rebound.