Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
$370 is enough to manipulate the price of a prediction market.
An article on LessWrong broke down several cases: Scott Alexander cited Anthropic's valuation market on Polymarket, saying "the market believes there's a 90% probability it will reach $500B". The author checked the orderbook, and the YES side had only $370 in total depth. Spending that amount could crash the price from 90% down to 76%.
Even more absurd is that for the same event, Kalshi showed 37% while Polymarket showed 22%. A 15 percentage point difference, because liquidity on both sides is so poor that the prices have no reference value. There are also markets on Manifold with zero trades for an entire week, yet they still get cited.
My own trading experience on Polymarket reflects this too — many markets have a displayed price, but the order book is so thin that a single trade of just tens of dollars can move the price several percentage points. Price existing and price being meaningful are two different things.
The original article is worth reading: