Bipartisan Bill Seeks To Shield Blockchain Developers From Criminal Liability

DEFI6,98%
  • New bill protects non-custodial developers from unfair prosecution.
  • Clarifies that Section 1960 applies only to those who control customer funds.
  • Bill draws a line between coders and money transmitters.
  • Backers say it safeguards U.S. crypto innovation.

US lawmakers have introduced the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 to protect software developers from criminal prosecution. The measure, which aims to draw a boundary between entities that control user funds and those who merely write code, includes a provision that the DeFi sector has long pressed for to be part of the CLARITY Act

Drawing the Line Between Developers and Money Transmitters

On Friday, Reps. Scott Fitzgerald, Zoe Lofgren, and Ben Cline introduced the novel bill to block the prosecution of software developers who write code, as opposed to those who hold and transmit customers’ assets. The legislation clarifies that Section 1960 of the Criminal Code only applies to developers who handle funds

It applies to individuals or entities that transfer funds on behalf of others without proper state licenses or that fail to comply with federal registration requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) obligations. The law is commonly used to prosecute illegal money transmission schemes, including those involving digital assets, when operators are found to be moving or controlling customer funds without authorization.

ADVERTISEMENTSection 1960 refers to 18 U.S.C. § 1960 of the federal criminal code, which classifies as criminal activity the operation of unlicensed money transmitting businesses. It makes it unlawful for anyone or any entity to transfer funds for others without the requisite state licenses and federal compliance requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) provisions

Authorities often invoke the provision to pursue unlawful money transmission schemes, including crypto-related cases, where individuals are accused of holding or moving customer funds without regulatory clearance.

The bill presents regulatory clarity to the debate of whether non-custodial developers should be prosecuted the same way as custodial actors. It aligns with the initial intent of Section 1960 and represents Congressional and judicial consensus on the matter

ADVERTISEMENT## Protecting Innovation While Targeting Criminal Activity

While section 1960 originally applied to custodial developers, the cases of Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet, where the law was applied to developers who wrote only code, necessitated the clear boundaries the bill establishes.

“For too long,” said Rep. Cline, “federal overreach has blurred the line between bad actors and the innovators building next-generation technology.”

“This bipartisan bill restores needed clarity by protecting developers who don’t control customer funds, while ensuring law enforcement can continue to target real criminals. I’m proud to support this effort to keep America the global leader in blockchain innovation.”

Over the past few years, experts raised an alarm over a massive outflow of American developers to other jurisdictions due to the fear of unfair prosecution. Once the new legislation gets passed, it will ensure the protection of these non-custodial developers, and by extension, secure the future of American leadership in the digital asset space.

ADVERTISEMENT

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

CLARITY Act Delay Continues as Senator Thom Tillis Signals Ongoing Talks

Lawmakers are delaying the CLARITY Act due to ongoing negotiations on stablecoin provisions, with timing uncertain and potential markup pushed to late April or early May. Kevin Warsh’s financial disclosures add complexity to regulatory discussions.

CryptoFrontNews1h ago

Democratic Senators Question Lax AML Oversight of Major CEX Over $1.7B Iran-Linked Crypto Flows

Democratic senators are scrutinizing the Trump administration's oversight of a cryptocurrency exchange linked to $1.7 billion in Iranian transactions, questioning its AML controls and a lenient bank settlement on sanctions evasion.

GateNews4h ago

French Finance Minister Calls for Expanded Use of Euro-Pegged Stablecoins

French Finance Minister Roland Lescure urged for greater use of euro-pegged stablecoins and active involvement from European banks to enhance competitiveness in the digital asset market, highlighting the need for deposit tokens to bridge traditional finance and blockchain technology.

GateNews5h ago

SEC Chair Paul Atkins Launches Official Podcast, Signals Pro-Innovation Crypto Stance

SEC Chair Paul Atkins launched his podcast "Material Matters," featuring Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda. They discussed a pro-innovation regulatory approach, criticizing past leadership and advocating for an open regulatory environment for digital assets.

GateNews10h ago

China to Strengthen Legislative Framework for AI, Digital Economy, and Blockchain

China plans to enhance its network legal system to address the needs of internet development, focusing on legislation for AI, digital economy, and other tech sectors. By December 2025, over 180 laws are expected, though current regulations still lag behind public expectations.

GateNews11h ago

U.S. Senator Blumenthal Pressures DOJ and Treasury Over Major CEX's Iran-Related Fund Flows

U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal has requested clarification from the DOJ and FinCEN regarding compliance monitors for a major cryptocurrency exchange, amid concerns over compliance failures linked to substantial funds associated with Iran.

GateNews12h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments