While most of the market focuses on AI tokens and L2 narratives, #DeSci (Decentralized Science) has been steadily building in the background. Not loudly. Not speculatively. But structurally. Traditional science faces well-known bottlenecks: ➟ Paywalled research ➟ Slow grant cycles ➟ Underutilized IP ➟ Limited patient ownership DeSci introduces a different coordination model using blockchain + token incentives: ➟ Tokenized IP (IP-NFTs, IPTs) ➟ Community-funded BioDAOs ➟ Onchain publishing ➟ User-owned health data ➟ Privacy-preserving AI compute As of Feb 2026: ➟ Total sector market cap: ~$300M ➟ 82 tokens live ➟ ~$50M daily volume ➟ 50+ active projects Key players include: ➟ AxonDAO ($AXGT) – decentralized health data vaults + GPU-backed AI compute ➟ OriginTrail ($TRAC) – verifiable knowledge graphs for science + AI ➟ Bio Protocol ($BIO) – DeSci launchpad layer funding labs and BioAgents ➟ VitaDAO ($VITA) – longevity research with 30+ funded projects ➟ ResearchCoin ($RSC) – incentivized open publishing What’s notable in 2026 is infrastructure maturity. Bio Protocol has directed $50M+ to labs, with projects progressing toward clinical milestones. VitaDAO continues funding longevity research with real biotech spin-outs. On the data layer, AxonDAO is building encrypted, user-owned health data vaults combined with compliant GPU compute infrastructure (including Oracle Cloud integration and NVIDIA Inception membership). The model is consent-first: users contribute data, earn tokens, and participate in upside. Meanwhile, Molecule continues tokenizing research IP, and platforms like ResearchHub are aligning incentives around open access. Why this matters? AI + blockchain + user-owned data create a new coordination layer for science. More consented data → Better AI models → Faster research cycles → More funding participation → More tokenized IP DeSci isn’t replacing traditional science overnight. But it’s building parallel rails - funding, data, IP, and compute - that make research more transparent, aligned, and programmable. Still early. Still small relative to broader crypto. But increasingly credible. Which DeSci project are you tracking most closely?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#DeSci – A Sector Quietly Gaining Strength
While most of the market focuses on AI tokens and L2 narratives, #DeSci (Decentralized Science) has been steadily building in the background.
Not loudly.
Not speculatively.
But structurally.
Traditional science faces well-known bottlenecks:
➟ Paywalled research
➟ Slow grant cycles
➟ Underutilized IP
➟ Limited patient ownership
DeSci introduces a different coordination model using blockchain + token incentives:
➟ Tokenized IP (IP-NFTs, IPTs)
➟ Community-funded BioDAOs
➟ Onchain publishing
➟ User-owned health data
➟ Privacy-preserving AI compute
As of Feb 2026:
➟ Total sector market cap: ~$300M
➟ 82 tokens live
➟ ~$50M daily volume
➟ 50+ active projects
Key players include:
➟ AxonDAO ($AXGT) – decentralized health data vaults + GPU-backed AI compute
➟ OriginTrail ($TRAC) – verifiable knowledge graphs for science + AI
➟ Bio Protocol ($BIO) – DeSci launchpad layer funding labs and BioAgents
➟ VitaDAO ($VITA) – longevity research with 30+ funded projects
➟ ResearchCoin ($RSC) – incentivized open publishing
What’s notable in 2026 is infrastructure maturity.
Bio Protocol has directed $50M+ to labs, with projects progressing toward clinical milestones. VitaDAO continues funding longevity research with real biotech spin-outs.
On the data layer, AxonDAO is building encrypted, user-owned health data vaults combined with compliant GPU compute infrastructure (including Oracle Cloud integration and NVIDIA Inception membership). The model is consent-first: users contribute data, earn tokens, and participate in upside.
Meanwhile, Molecule continues tokenizing research IP, and platforms like ResearchHub are aligning incentives around open access.
Why this matters?
AI + blockchain + user-owned data create a new coordination layer for science.
More consented data
→ Better AI models
→ Faster research cycles
→ More funding participation
→ More tokenized IP
DeSci isn’t replacing traditional science overnight.
But it’s building parallel rails - funding, data, IP, and compute - that make research more transparent, aligned, and programmable.
Still early.
Still small relative to broader crypto.
But increasingly credible.
Which DeSci project are you tracking most closely?