South Korean authorities have confirmed that 22 bitcoin, worth about $1.5 million, vanished from a cold wallet held by the Seoul Gangnam Police Station in a 2021 financial crime case.
Another Crypto Custody Failure Hits South Korean Authorities
According to local reporting, the bitcoin had been voluntarily surrendered in November 2021 during a virtual asset investigation and stored offline in a USB-type hardware wallet as court evidence. The device itself remains intact, but a nationwide audit in January 2026 revealed the funds had been transferred to an external blockchain address without any reported physical breach.
Blockchain analysis confirmed the outflow, stunning officials who believed cold storage would prevent remote access. The loss went undetected for more than four years, raising sharp questions about monitoring procedures for seized digital assets. At current market prices, the missing 22 BTC are valued at roughly $1.5 million.
The discovery follows a separate incident in August 2025, when the Gwangju District Prosecutor’s Office lost 320 BTC in what officials later described as a phishing-related breach. In that case, credentials were compromised during an asset handover, allowing funds to be drained while the hardware wallet remained untouched.
The Gyeonggi Bukbu Provincial Police Agency has launched an internal investigation into the Gangnam case, reviewing access logs, personnel handling, and possible technical vulnerabilities. Authorities are examining whether phishing, improper key management, or insider involvement played a role. No recovery of the funds has been reported.
The back-to-back incidents have intensified scrutiny of how South Korean law enforcement manages seized cryptocurrency. Cold wallets are designed to keep private keys offline, but they still depend on human procedures, audits, and secure key handling. When those fail, even “offline” assets can disappear.
With two high-profile losses now public, pressure is building for tighter custody protocols, multi-signature controls, and more frequent audits. For a country known for strict crypto enforcement, the message is clear: securing digital evidence requires more than locking a USB drive in a drawer.
FAQ ❓
- **What happened in the Gangnam bitcoin case?**Police confirmed that 22 seized bitcoin were transferred out of a cold wallet without physical theft.
- **How were the funds discovered missing?**A nationwide audit in January 2026 uncovered the discrepancy through blockchain review.
- **Was this the first such incident in South Korea?**No, authorities previously reported a 320 BTC loss linked to phishing in August 2025.
- **Have the missing bitcoin been recovered?**No recovery has been announced as of mid-February 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SpaceX holds approximately $603 million worth of Bitcoin, and in the same period recorded nearly $5 billion in losses due to integrating xAI.
Gate News update: April 12. SpaceX currently holds Bitcoin worth about $603 million. In the same period, the company recorded a nearly $5 billion loss due to integrating xAI. Despite the large loss, SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings have remained unchanged since mid-2024, with no signs of selling.
GateNews4m ago
Contract whale 「sets 10 big targets first」: a short position hits the stop-loss level of $73,500; if it closes 2,567.49 BTC, it will incur a loss of $4.99M
According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi’s monitoring, the contract whale has updated its stop-loss strategy. BTC spiked to the stop-loss level of $73,500 in the short term. It may have already closed 2,567.49 BTC, incurring a loss of $4.99M. The stop-loss points for the remaining ETH are unknown.
GateNews7m ago
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”—Adam Back quickly clears things up after being targeted
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has persisted for 17 years in the crypto world. Speculation about this pseudonym has never stopped—candidates have ranged from cryptographers to corporate founders—but there has always been a lack of evidence to definitively settle the matter.
Recently, The New York Times published a multi-thousand-word investigation that, based on multiple comparisons drawn from linguistic style, technical pathways, and historical context, listed Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, the claim was quickly and clearly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again, with the investigation targeting Adam Back
In this investigation, The New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year and a half deeply sorting through archives spanning decades, as well as the cryptographic punk email list, to
区块客1h ago
BTC 15-minute drop of 0.45%: Aggressive sell-side orders lead, layered with weakening liquidity at the margin, amplifying volatility
2026-04-11 23:00 to 2026-04-11 23:15（UTC）, BTC’s return over 15 minutes was -0.45%, and the price fluctuated within the range of 72907.4 to 73370.7 USDT, with a swing amplitude of 0.63%. During this period, market activity remains at a high level, but the price anomaly has drawn investors’ short-term attention. Overall trading sentiment is slightly cautious, and volatility is marginally higher than usual.
The main driver behind this anomaly is that active sell orders have a slight advantage, causing a short-term downward adjustment in price. Combined with a modest increase in trading volume for major trading pairs and spot
GateNews1h ago
