Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
South Korea's Missing Seized Bitcoin: A $48M Phishing Attack Raises Custody Security Concerns
Source: CryptoTale Original Title: Seized Bitcoin Vanishes as South Korea Expands Crypto Control Original Link: South Korean prosecutors are investigating the disappearance of Bitcoin seized as criminal proceeds after an internal audit flagged missing assets under state custody. Authorities estimate the loss at approximately 70 billion won, or $48 million. A senior prosecution source indicated that the Bitcoin likely vanished during management in mid-2025.
Audit Findings and Suspected Phishing Attack
The Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office confirmed the missing Bitcoin during a recent internal review. The assets came from a prior criminal case and no longer appear in official records.
Prosecutors believe the loss occurred in the middle of last year while officials stored and managed the Bitcoin. Investigators suspect phishing, though they declined to disclose exact amounts or current valuations during the ongoing probe.
Early evidence indicates that officials stored the Bitcoin on a portable USB device with a custody system. Reports also state that a wallet password reached a third party during a routine inspection, enabling unauthorized transfers.
Legal Context and Prior Precedents
The case surfaced shortly after a Supreme Court ruling confirmed that Bitcoin held on exchanges can be seized under the Criminal Procedure Act. The ruling involved 55.6 BTC seized from a money laundering suspect.
That decision reinforced earlier judgments that classify cryptocurrencies as intangible assets with economic value. A 2018 ruling first established that courts could seize crypto linked to criminal activity. Later decisions expanded seizure authority further, confirming that Bitcoin on domestic exchanges qualifies for confiscation during criminal proceedings.
Broader Security Concerns
This marks the second major Bitcoin controversy tied to Gwangju authorities. In November 2021, 1,476 BTC disappeared during a police seizure from an illegal gambling site, with litigation still pending.
The present case raises critical security concerns about internal controls and human vulnerabilities in state custody of digital assets. The data shows that worldwide phishing and scam activities resulted in $1.37 billion of losses during 2025, representing a 64% increase from the previous year.
With over 16 million crypto account holders in South Korea, the case underscores the security risks arising from current methods authorities use to store and protect digital assets. The incident demonstrates that human mistakes pose a greater security risk to institutional cryptocurrency operations than blockchain technology weaknesses.