2026-01-23 03:23:12

Recently, I discovered an interesting pattern—if you want to make some achievements in cryptocurrency or any industry, instead of blindly exploring, it's better to directly analyze the growth paths of successful people in this circle. The pitfalls they have stepped into and the roads they have traveled are itself the most practical map. By repeatedly studying how these top figures went from zero to one, and then to the industry top, you'll find many commonalities. These insights are often more useful than any textbook. This is not just admiration, but a systematic learning method.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProbablyNothing

· 9h ago

That's right, but the key is to find the right people to break it down; otherwise, you're just learning the survivor bias. Copying successful people's paths sounds easy, but when it comes to actual execution, you realize that each person's timing and luck might be more important than the strategy. There are quite a few failures in this circle; whether they can fill their pits is the real issue. But indeed, researching real cases is more satisfying than just daydreaming, for example... Hmm, systematic learning sounds like having a plan, but most of us are still just messing around haha. Basically, it's copying homework; the key is whether you can copy well. It's easy to boast about going from zero to one, but reaching the top is where real skill is tested. I've already tried this set of theories; they work a bit but aren't that miraculous. If the success paths of top figures are so replicable, why are so many still failing? It makes some sense, but don't expect to succeed just by copying; this circle changes too fast. I do believe in commonalities, but execution is the real barrier.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 9h ago

You can't beat their trading strategies, but at least you can learn how to survive. --- That's right, but most people read it in vain; execution is the real scarcity. --- The cost of falling into traps is really high; copying others' work is tempting. --- The question is how the top players got to the top; some things they can't even explain. --- This is the process of information gap turning into knowledge gap; the key is whether you have the courage to use it. --- After studying for a long time, I found that luck played a big role; feeling emo now. --- Systematic learning + betting on the right trend—both are essential; just learning is useless.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 9h ago

Learning paths are indeed like this, but to be honest, most people won't be able to learn even after watching. --- Sorry, I just remembered those friends who "copied the methods of big V influencers" and still ended up losing money... --- Dissecting is one thing, but the key is having the conditions and luck, right? --- The logic isn't wrong, but how many people can actually execute it... --- Damn, this is exactly what I've been doing all along. Looks like the approach isn't wrong. --- Successful people's paths have commonalities, but the market has changed. Can it still be copied now? --- Sounds good in theory, but in practice, it's just two words: too difficult. --- Why do I feel like big V influencers never truly share their core logic sincerely?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-7b078580

· 9h ago

However, the data shows that most of those who follow the successful revival paths haven't survived a single bear market. Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0