Perpetual Contract Protocol TroveMarkets exposed issues right after launch. The project completed fundraising with a valuation of $20 million FDV, which sounds pretty good, but its performance after going live was shocking—only an additional $500,000 in liquidity.



What’s more concerning is the token distribution. The project team released about 15 million TROVE tokens all at once. The result? A large number of new wallets received between 5 million and 10 million tokens, then immediately sold them off. Single transactions ranged from $30,000 to $84,000, with no hesitation.

This pattern closely resembles early project fundraising tactics: high valuation fundraising → liquidity shortage → token oversupply → quick cash-out. On-chain analyst Specter bluntly stated that Trove has a tendency to become a project similar to "2026" (note: incomplete in the original). In other words, this is likely another cautionary example of a liquidity trap and token distribution imbalance. For participants, this is a risk signal worth paying attention to.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityLarryvip
· 01-22 01:44
It's the same old story again, the fundraising numbers look good, but as soon as it goes live, it drops the ball. 500,000 liquidity? Laughable, this is just a honey pot, buddy. I've memorized this routine: overvaluation → hype → dump. Trove's moves are textbook level. A one-time airdrop of 15 million tokens? Are you brain dead? Isn't this just setting a trap for others to take the bait? Those new wallets, brothers, are responding pretty well—getting tokens and then running. That's what smart investors do. If it were me, I'd run too. Don't ask me why I didn't invest; I'm tired of this kind of show. What's next?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-20 10:14
It's the same old trick again. Overhyped meme coins are really nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyervip
· 01-20 04:50
Another scheme to fleece retail investors has been exposed, this time even the concealment was too lazy to hide. Trove is such a terrible project, dumping 15 million tokens all at once, with a new wallet cashing out instantly. Isn't this just the project team promoting themselves? 500,000 in liquidity... LOL. Is this "operation" or "escape"?
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 01-20 04:49
Another typical move by a big project, copying with overestimated valuation is really pointless
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 01-20 04:42
I'm too familiar with this routine, it's another script for overvalued projects to fleece retail investors... 500,000 in liquidity? That's hilarious, this is just a honey pot. Oh my God, Trove has used all the tricks this time, connecting a new wallet to dump coins immediately—who would catch it here? Again with this? Overvalued valuation, low liquidity + over-issued tokens, the classic "raise funds first, then run" combo. Honestly, projects these days don't even bother pretending... it looks just like a fishing scheme, waiting for newcomers to rush in. Why do people still dare to leverage on such projects? I really don't understand.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeavervip
· 01-20 04:40
Again with the same tricks, overestimating valuation to enter, liquidity turning into a complete mess, tokens dumping. Trove's move is really top-notch, raising $20 million but only leaving $500,000 in liquidity—almost asking "How do you want to die?" --- 150 million tokens released all at once, new wallets instantly turn into cash-out machines. Isn't this just openly scamming retail investors? --- Honestly, we've seen through these kinds of projects so many times. It's nothing but hype about valuation, launching at dump prices, and token holders racing to escape. Specter is right; it's definitely a liquidity trap. --- Really, every time such a project launches, the first question should be: Where's the liquidity? How outrageous is the token distribution? Just these two data points can determine life or death. --- If Trove's move can be called creative, the only creativity is in "how to make investors go bankrupt the fastest." --- For those still thinking about participating in such projects, you really are brave.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 01-20 04:38
It's the same old trick again: overvalued financing, liquidity drying up, tokens crashing down all at once, then big players turn around and run. I'll try this smart trap first.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-20 04:28
It's the same old trick again, raised 20 million with a valuation, launched with 500,000 liquidity, hilarious. Trove's token distribution is outrageous, 15 million tokens dumped all at once, new wallets get them and run. I just want to ask, who the hell would take the bait? This is the daily life of Web3—high valuation → liquidity desert → token dump, old tricks. Basically, it's a honey pot, waiting for retail investors to get caught. How are there still people willing to touch such projects? Specter is right, this is a prelude to the tragedy of 2026.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)