From a trader's perspective, the recent market movements have appeared quite rational, with no emotional surges. In fact, this restraint is the part that is seriously underestimated.
Purely from a valuation standpoint, this project is on a similar level to several other zk projects. However, its technical implementation capability is entirely in a different league. Ethereum is limited by the constraints of its repeat execution model, and many complex application scenarios—VIP tiering, strategy judgment, big data analysis—once run on-chain, the costs and delays immediately spiral out of control. This also explains why many DeFi products are forced to adopt simplified designs.
So, what is truly impressive about this project? It’s not hype-driven concept promotion like PPT presentations, but rather that it genuinely solves two core pain points that traders care most about:
- Proof generation cost is about 50% lower than similar solutions. - Real-time zk proof generation. - Actual execution efficiency can be improved by approximately 3.4 times.
What does this mean? On-chain logic that previously couldn’t be done, couldn’t be done at scale, or couldn’t be done quickly, can now be directly implemented.
From a funding perspective, more importantly: it is no longer in the stage of “may be used in the future,” but rather an infrastructure that many DeFi projects are already using and cannot do without. Once a project becomes a core dependency, its valuation logic shifts from simple narrative premiums to infrastructure premiums.
Looking further ahead, perpetual exchanges, prediction markets, complex derivatives—these tracks are fundamentally highly dependent on the performance ceiling of infrastructure. When the sector truly heats up, the underlying capabilities will be re-priced, rather than just hype at the application layer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDoctrine
· 3h ago
The infrastructure premium has really been overlooked by the market this time. When perpetuals explode, it will be time for re-pricing.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 4h ago
Hmm... The infrastructure premium has indeed been underestimated, but wait, are we really using it at scale?
The key moment is when the track takes off. It's a bit early to talk about underlying re-pricing now.
How long this can be held is still uncertain. Don't be fooled by low-cost numbers.
There are indeed many PPT hype, but don't overpromise on implementation. Let's talk when real-world data comes out.
50% cost advantage, 3.4 times efficiency... sounds impressive, but the key is whether the ecosystem buys into it.
Ultimately, in the infrastructure track, it all depends on who can survive until the application explosion moment.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 01-08 20:36
Really? This steady trend without agitation is actually more solid and much more reliable than those coins that surge wildly every day.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-07 20:53
This is true infrastructure, not those projects that just tell stories every day.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 01-07 20:48
Wow, this is the real fundamental infrastructure premium logic, not just armchair theorizing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 01-07 20:46
Wait, does this zk solution really offer a 3.4x improvement? Or is it just another round of PPT magic?
I believe in the infrastructure premium, but those who are exiting now are probably taking heavy losses.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 01-07 20:40
The real opportunity lies in restraining the market, which is why mainstream perspectives can't see it.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-07 20:24
Undervalued indeed, but when it really starts to rise, it's still these folks shouting the loudest.
From a trader's perspective, the recent market movements have appeared quite rational, with no emotional surges. In fact, this restraint is the part that is seriously underestimated.
Purely from a valuation standpoint, this project is on a similar level to several other zk projects. However, its technical implementation capability is entirely in a different league. Ethereum is limited by the constraints of its repeat execution model, and many complex application scenarios—VIP tiering, strategy judgment, big data analysis—once run on-chain, the costs and delays immediately spiral out of control. This also explains why many DeFi products are forced to adopt simplified designs.
So, what is truly impressive about this project? It’s not hype-driven concept promotion like PPT presentations, but rather that it genuinely solves two core pain points that traders care most about:
- Proof generation cost is about 50% lower than similar solutions.
- Real-time zk proof generation.
- Actual execution efficiency can be improved by approximately 3.4 times.
What does this mean? On-chain logic that previously couldn’t be done, couldn’t be done at scale, or couldn’t be done quickly, can now be directly implemented.
From a funding perspective, more importantly: it is no longer in the stage of “may be used in the future,” but rather an infrastructure that many DeFi projects are already using and cannot do without. Once a project becomes a core dependency, its valuation logic shifts from simple narrative premiums to infrastructure premiums.
Looking further ahead, perpetual exchanges, prediction markets, complex derivatives—these tracks are fundamentally highly dependent on the performance ceiling of infrastructure. When the sector truly heats up, the underlying capabilities will be re-priced, rather than just hype at the application layer.