2026-01-07 20:07:26

A few days ago, there was a mistake in the operation. I reversed the order at 0.139 and ended up adding to the position. The current situation is quite interesting— the price is basically at the level of spot orders. From this perspective, the cost performance is indeed quite good.

Here's the question. For projects at the IP level, would truly capable whales be interested? To take a step back, even if someone enters the market to manipulate, control, and draw lines, creating a Chinese meme sector is not impossible. After all, in this ecosystem, funds and consensus often can shape unexpected outcomes.

MEME1,36%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FloorSweeper

· 1h ago

Getting it wrong actually makes you money; this luck is incredible!

View OriginalReply0

BTCBeliefStation

· 10h ago

Haha, I really respect the courage to add positions with a reverse hand; this is the gambler's spirit. The big players really look down on this size, but retail investors piling up might actually be able to play some tricks.

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 01-07 20:36

Adding positions in this way is really brilliant, losing money by mistake and still making a profit Whale market meme sector? Let's see what the funds say first That move at 0.139, you must have a big heart Breaking the cauldrons and sinking the boats to add positions, I'm amazed Consensus is something that can be hyped up; with funds in place, anything is possible The cost-performance ratio is good, but do you really dare to go all-in?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-07 20:22

Even if you make a mistake, you can still add to your position with a counter move. This level of operational artistry is quite high.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-07 20:20

Good morning, at 2 a.m. I was thinking—doing the opposite of the order and increasing the position; I know this process too well, it's the old trick of "mistake equals opportunity." But if we’re talking about the big players, IP-level markets have already been played through multiple rounds. The ones still daring to enter are either bagholders or genuinely aiming to build a Chinese meme ecosystem. What can capital and consensus shape? Honestly, it's just a liquidity trap. Once you believe it, you'll see the arbitrage zone.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-07 20:12

Adding positions by reversing hand requires some courage, but the current price level is indeed attractive. Does the big player really see value in this? Creating a Chinese meme sector does have quite some potential. This ecosystem is just consensus multiplied by capital; anything can be driven up.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-07 20:11

Adding to the position with a reverse move, it depends on whether it can turn around later. --- Will the big players really be interested in this market? It feels a bit uncertain. --- Capital consensus takes off together; anything can be hyped up. This is the current ecosystem. --- 0.139 reverse addition? Brother, how big must your heart be? --- The Chinese meme sector sounds a bit absurd, but it's not without opportunity. --- Price is close to spot, and the cost-performance ratio is pretty good, but the key question is: is there someone to take the order? --- The most feared thing is that the projects you believe in actually have no buyers at all. --- It's still a bit difficult for this IP project to attract big players. --- Capital can shape consensus, and consensus can drive prices; this cycle works like that. --- It's commendable to have the courage to add to the position with a reverse move, but I'm just worried about being trapped for too long.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-07 20:11

Adding to the position with a backhand move is brilliant; now the cost-performance ratio is right here. The big players won't touch this, but we might be able to come up with something. I'm just worried that funds and consensus might not align.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 01-07 20:09

0.139 That Nabo's move was really sharp; I really admire your mindset of adding positions with a counter move.

View OriginalReply0