The idea is quite straightforward: hide sensitive financial data and avoid broadcasting it loudly everywhere. Only unseal the data when needed, run it in a trusted environment, and then publish the proof—so that trading counterparts can verify whether the results are genuine and valid. This way, privacy is protected, and everyone can feel assured.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 01-07 20:01
This is the core logic of zkP; privacy and trust are not mutually exclusive. The key is how to design it.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-07 19:56
That's reasonable. Zero-knowledge proofs are actually the perfect balance between privacy and transparency. Keep the data in your own pocket, and only share the verification results with everyone. No one can find fault.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-07 19:43
This set of privacy computing concepts sounds good, but how many "trusted environments" that can truly be trusted are there now?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReader
· 01-07 19:40
This approach sounds good, but the key is who defines the "trusted environment." This area could easily become a new trust black hole.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-07 19:35
This approach indeed works well; the balance between privacy and transparency is quite well achieved.
The idea is quite straightforward: hide sensitive financial data and avoid broadcasting it loudly everywhere. Only unseal the data when needed, run it in a trusted environment, and then publish the proof—so that trading counterparts can verify whether the results are genuine and valid. This way, privacy is protected, and everyone can feel assured.