Recently, I've been pondering a question repeatedly: What exactly has Web3 revived?
Digital assets, identity verification, on-chain governance — we've heard these words enough times. But upon closer reflection, it seems Web3 has overlooked humanity's most primitive and valuable thing: relationships themselves.
Relationships generate trust, trust reduces cooperation costs, and cooperation creates value. This logic works rapidly in the real world, but breaks when moved onto the blockchain. We have wallet addresses, but no relationship networks. There are various tokens, but a lack of trust accumulation. We have voting rights, but our collaboration history is a mess.
It wasn't until I saw what Walrus is doing that I realized — someone is seriously working to change this situation. They are trying to turn relationships themselves into programmable, transferable capital.
Traditional finance has tokenized everything — houses, cash flows, voting rights — all sorted out. But relationships, that thing, remain invisible, vague, and untransferable. The irony is clear: the most valuable collaboration networks can't be measured by any financial instrument. Walrus is filling this gap.
Don't think of WAL as a "social token" — that's just packaging personal influence for sale. WAL focuses on something else: how the value between relationships flows.
A helps B with verification, B and C complete a project together, C provides a key solution in D's task. These interactions are just history in traditional models — forgettable and unusable. But in the Walrus system, every interaction is recorded, can be accumulated, verified, and truly influence subsequent trust decisions.
This assetization of relationships is supported by three pillars:
First is verifiable interaction history. Not based on self-introductions or recommendation letters, but on on-chain, verifiable records of cooperation.
Second is dynamic credit scoring. It’s not static; it evolves as you collaborate across different scenarios and with different people.
Third is composable economic incentives. What can you do with your relationship assets? Participate in new projects, gain easier access to financing, or even directly monetize — these application scenarios will grow increasingly numerous.
This logic is highly significant for the Web3 ecosystem. Many current DeFi, DAO, and NFT communities fail because of poor collaboration and information asymmetry. If relationships themselves can be quantified, tracked, and traded, then vertical domain collaborations could operate as efficiently as financial markets.
Developer communities, creative networks, entrepreneurial ecosystems — aren’t they all built on relationships? Once these relationships acquire financial attributes, the entire Web3 productivity could leap by an order of magnitude.
Of course, it’s still early to say all this. Walrus is in the early exploration stage, figuring out how to prevent relationship data from being misused, how to balance privacy and transparency — these issues are not fully resolved yet. But the direction is right; the rest is a matter of technology and time.
What I am optimistic about is that some projects dare to break the mold. They are not just repeating the DeFi playbook but asking — what else can Web3 do that humans truly need? The question of relationship capitalization is a good answer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LadderToolGuy
· 01-10 17:24
The idea of tokenizing relationships is indeed innovative, but honestly, quantifying trust is still a big challenge.
It seems like everything now is trying to be financialized, and relationships are no exception...
I understand Walrus's logic, but when it comes to real implementation, can the data privacy aspect be maintained? Or does it become just another tracking tool?
This is what Web3 should be doing, not the tricks of cutting leeks.
The problem is that existing on-chain communities don't have that many genuine interaction records. How can we establish foundational data?
Early projects are like this—great potential but also high execution risks.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 01-10 09:59
ngl this hits different... so walrus is basically trying to make relationships an actual asset? that's either genius or completely delusional and i'm here for both outcomes ser
Reply0
BottomMisser
· 01-07 19:51
The idea that relationships can be tokenized... you're right, Web3 indeed lacks this aspect right now.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 01-07 19:48
From the perspective of relationship programmability, I hadn't really thought about it before, but it feels like we're back to the old tricks of a society based on personal connections.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-07 19:45
I am still a bit skeptical about the idea of tokenizing relationships, but this approach is indeed innovative. It depends on how Walrus plays it.
---
Another project to fill a gap, sounds promising, but I'm just worried it might end up being another air coin.
---
Exactly, Web3 now is just a bunch of addresses and tokens. There's no real connection between people, and collaboration costs are ridiculously high.
---
If credit scoring could truly be tied to collaboration, DAO governance might see fewer unfinished projects.
---
I'm curious about how privacy is handled—who controls the data once relationship data is on the chain?
---
Instead of trading coins, maybe trading relationships? It sounds a bit risky, but it points to a real issue.
---
Isn't this just LinkedIn on chain? Why does it have to be tokenized?
---
Finally, someone said it—Web3 really needs more down-to-earth stuff like this.
---
If it can truly track collaboration history, it would be very useful for developer communities, but only if it's transparent enough.
---
Interesting, but can Walrus survive the bear market? I’m optimistic about this direction.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 01-07 19:45
Regarding putting relationships on the blockchain, I just want to ask—can it truly prevent human nature from doing evil?
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-07 19:34
Really, I never thought about relationship capitalization from this perspective. Brilliant.
---
Walrus's logic is essentially about financializing credit, reliable.
---
Wait, what about privacy? Recording all relationships on-chain might be too transparent.
---
The DeFi scene is already saturated; I hope someone dares to think of something new.
---
The core issue is that trust costs are too high. Can this really be solved?
---
Relationship circulation... The potential is indeed huge, but execution will probably involve stepping into countless pitfalls.
---
I just want to know how Walrus prevents data spamming; otherwise, this system might also become useless.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretender
· 01-07 19:31
Is the relationship turning into a token? I thought of this logic a long time ago, but the key is how to prevent the brothers from forming cliques to manipulate relationships.
Recently, I've been pondering a question repeatedly: What exactly has Web3 revived?
Digital assets, identity verification, on-chain governance — we've heard these words enough times. But upon closer reflection, it seems Web3 has overlooked humanity's most primitive and valuable thing: relationships themselves.
Relationships generate trust, trust reduces cooperation costs, and cooperation creates value. This logic works rapidly in the real world, but breaks when moved onto the blockchain. We have wallet addresses, but no relationship networks. There are various tokens, but a lack of trust accumulation. We have voting rights, but our collaboration history is a mess.
It wasn't until I saw what Walrus is doing that I realized — someone is seriously working to change this situation. They are trying to turn relationships themselves into programmable, transferable capital.
Traditional finance has tokenized everything — houses, cash flows, voting rights — all sorted out. But relationships, that thing, remain invisible, vague, and untransferable. The irony is clear: the most valuable collaboration networks can't be measured by any financial instrument. Walrus is filling this gap.
Don't think of WAL as a "social token" — that's just packaging personal influence for sale. WAL focuses on something else: how the value between relationships flows.
A helps B with verification, B and C complete a project together, C provides a key solution in D's task. These interactions are just history in traditional models — forgettable and unusable. But in the Walrus system, every interaction is recorded, can be accumulated, verified, and truly influence subsequent trust decisions.
This assetization of relationships is supported by three pillars:
First is verifiable interaction history. Not based on self-introductions or recommendation letters, but on on-chain, verifiable records of cooperation.
Second is dynamic credit scoring. It’s not static; it evolves as you collaborate across different scenarios and with different people.
Third is composable economic incentives. What can you do with your relationship assets? Participate in new projects, gain easier access to financing, or even directly monetize — these application scenarios will grow increasingly numerous.
This logic is highly significant for the Web3 ecosystem. Many current DeFi, DAO, and NFT communities fail because of poor collaboration and information asymmetry. If relationships themselves can be quantified, tracked, and traded, then vertical domain collaborations could operate as efficiently as financial markets.
Developer communities, creative networks, entrepreneurial ecosystems — aren’t they all built on relationships? Once these relationships acquire financial attributes, the entire Web3 productivity could leap by an order of magnitude.
Of course, it’s still early to say all this. Walrus is in the early exploration stage, figuring out how to prevent relationship data from being misused, how to balance privacy and transparency — these issues are not fully resolved yet. But the direction is right; the rest is a matter of technology and time.
What I am optimistic about is that some projects dare to break the mold. They are not just repeating the DeFi playbook but asking — what else can Web3 do that humans truly need? The question of relationship capitalization is a good answer.