The story of the internet has been told for decades, with a core logic: platforms control data and platform profits. In Web3, this script is about to be reversed.
From a different perspective, data in the internet era is like "crude oil," requiring platforms to refine it to generate value; in the Web3 era, there's a new approach—making data directly tradable as "refined commodities." This shift sounds simple, but in reality, it represents a paradigm leap from "I own your data" to "I can verify the authenticity of the data."
What is the traditional internet model? Platform = owner of data. Users produce content, platforms own, control, and monetize it, resulting in data monopolies and privacy issues everywhere. Web3 aims to solve this by returning data ownership to users, but there's a tough problem: now that users own their data, how can third parties verify that the data is genuine and complete without trusting the platform?
This is where verifiable storage layers like Walrus come into play. Their approach is as follows: user data is stored in Walrus's decentralized network, with ownership always belonging to the user; any DApp or smart contract can verify the authenticity and integrity of the data directly through on-chain stored data hashes, without any trust relationships, and then trigger corresponding logic. In other words, data is neither controlled by any platform nor unreliable; it can reliably generate credit, drive contract execution, and support asset minting.
In this system, the role of the WAL token is clear: it is the fuel for the "data verification economy." It pays storage nodes, serves as the settlement unit for global verification services, and its value is proportional to the network's overall demand for trusted data.
Therefore, what Walrus is doing is not just providing storage space but building the infrastructure for Web3-native data value exchange—allowing data to create genuine, trustworthy value without being "owned."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkThisDAO
· 1h ago
Someone finally explained this logic clearly. Verification is truly the killer feature of Web3 data.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 4h ago
Data verification economy, sounds pretty fresh. But for it to really take off, users still need to trust Walrus. Isn't this just a different ruler?
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 10h ago
It sounds good, but the key is whether users will actually use it
---
I get the logic of Walrus, but after data ownership returns to the users, most people will still be cut off
---
From "I control your data" to "I verify your data," it sounds like a different way of charging
---
Verifiable storage is indeed a pain point; the real issue is where the demand for WAL comes from
---
Another narrative aiming to disrupt the internet; the story is well told, but I haven't seen it truly implemented
---
Direct data circulation as a commodity? Uh, that sounds even more terrifying than platform monopolies...
---
WAL linked to storage demand, I believe in this logic, but the key is who will provide this demand
---
Web3 has always wanted to reverse the script, but it’s still just old wine in new bottles; users are still the chives
---
A trustworthy data value exchange infrastructure sounds impressive, but how does it actually make money?
---
What Walrus is doing just seems like a name change for data custodians
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 01-07 18:56
Sounds good, but the reality is that most users don't care about data ownership; they just want easy and affordable services.
WAL's logic is clear, but the question is who will incentivize the nodes, and is the cost high?
Data verification economics sound nice, but I still want to know how much can be earned.
Can Walrus succeed? It feels like another grand vision.
Returning ownership to users sounds great, but do users really understand verification?
Once this infrastructure is built, what will the user experience be like? Will it still be complicated?
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 01-07 18:55
Oh my god, someone finally clarified the issue of data ownership. I used to think Web3 was just switching platforms to get exploited again.
The platform control over data trick is getting old; it needs to change.
Walrus sounds like it could really solve the verification problem, but it depends on how it is implemented.
Another new concept, I have to study it all over again. It’s really exhausting.
It still feels like the trust issue hasn't been fully resolved. Whether verification is reliable or not still needs to be proven through practice.
Whether the WAL token can succeed depends mainly on the network scale. Its use in a small ecosystem is limited.
Data value exchange sounds impressive, but do users really care about ownership? Honestly, as long as it’s enjoyable to use, that’s enough.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-07 18:54
Data ownership sounds great, but can it really verify authenticity? Easier said than done.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 01-07 18:50
The key is that someone actually uses it, otherwise it's just a castle in the air.
Web3 has been talked about for so long—data ownership, privacy protection... all sound right, but ordinary users don't care at all; they just want convenience.
Walrus indeed solves the trust issue, but at what cost? Could it be more expensive than centralized solutions?
Data verifiability is a good thing, but can the verification economy be sustained? It still feels like concepts outweigh applications.
Internet giants will never willingly give up their data dominance; the real confrontation is just beginning.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-07 18:48
honestly, we're still in the early miles of this adoption curve. walrus solving the verification problem without trust layers? that's the kind of fundamental shift that compounds over quarters, not days. been accumulating quality infrastructure plays since the last cycle—this is just another water station for the ultra-marathon runners 🏃
Reply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-07 18:42
Sounds good, but can it really turn around the stubborn problem of data monopoly?
I get the idea of Walrus—verify without owning, sounds elegant. The question is, will users actively manage their data? Most people are still too lazy to bother.
WAL tokens are linked to demand... this logic makes sense, it all depends on how big the ecosystem can grow.
Turning data directly into a commodity is indeed revolutionary, but this approach still needs to prove it can get off the ground.
It feels like we're back to the old problem—who will maintain the credibility of this decentralized network?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-07 18:27
Wait, I buy the analogy of data shifting from oil to commodities, but can Walrus really solve the trust issue? It still sounds like we need a trusted node.
The story of the internet has been told for decades, with a core logic: platforms control data and platform profits. In Web3, this script is about to be reversed.
From a different perspective, data in the internet era is like "crude oil," requiring platforms to refine it to generate value; in the Web3 era, there's a new approach—making data directly tradable as "refined commodities." This shift sounds simple, but in reality, it represents a paradigm leap from "I own your data" to "I can verify the authenticity of the data."
What is the traditional internet model? Platform = owner of data. Users produce content, platforms own, control, and monetize it, resulting in data monopolies and privacy issues everywhere. Web3 aims to solve this by returning data ownership to users, but there's a tough problem: now that users own their data, how can third parties verify that the data is genuine and complete without trusting the platform?
This is where verifiable storage layers like Walrus come into play. Their approach is as follows: user data is stored in Walrus's decentralized network, with ownership always belonging to the user; any DApp or smart contract can verify the authenticity and integrity of the data directly through on-chain stored data hashes, without any trust relationships, and then trigger corresponding logic. In other words, data is neither controlled by any platform nor unreliable; it can reliably generate credit, drive contract execution, and support asset minting.
In this system, the role of the WAL token is clear: it is the fuel for the "data verification economy." It pays storage nodes, serves as the settlement unit for global verification services, and its value is proportional to the network's overall demand for trusted data.
Therefore, what Walrus is doing is not just providing storage space but building the infrastructure for Web3-native data value exchange—allowing data to create genuine, trustworthy value without being "owned."