2026-01-07 18:21:24

The $MNTS price action has been executing a textbook gapper/swing scenario that mirrors the setup we've seen with $INBS. The breakout pattern is playing out exactly as anticipated, showing strong technical confluence. This kind of comparative analysis between assets helps traders identify similar momentum structures across different trading pairs.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMaskVictim

· 23h ago

MNTs this time really has something, just like the INBS pattern, the technical aspect is just too strong.

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 01-10 07:41

MNT's recent momentum is indeed impressive, but compared to INBS last time, this time's level of confirmation feels a bit lacking.

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 01-09 07:07

Textbook-level trend? Ha, I've seen too many textbook cases that end up as tragic stories. $MNTS This rebound will eventually pull back; the more aggressively it's promoted, the more it will hurt when it falls.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-07 18:51

This wave of MNTS's trend is indeed interesting, similar to the INBS logic... but I'm just worried it might look good on paper but end up cutting leeks in reality, and the technical aspect could collapse even more severely then.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-07 18:51

Hmm... I see that MNTS is following the same pattern as INBS, but the key is whether it can hold after breaking the support.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-07 18:50

Well, the Gapper strategy can indeed make money; it all depends on who reacts faster.

View OriginalReply0

RebaseVictim

· 01-07 18:40

MNT's recent trend definitely has some potential, but can it really replicate the INBS market situation... It still seems to depend on whether it can hold this position in the future.

View OriginalReply0