2026-01-07 16:35:11

Here's an interesting arbitrage play worth breaking down:

**The Setup:**
Short 50 BTC on one major exchange (funding rate 10.95%) while simultaneously longing 50 BTC on another platform (funding rate 3.5%). Pretty straightforward directional hedge.

**The Twist:**
But here's where it gets clever—use a yield protocol to balance things out. Short 50 BTC and collect 5.39% in funding, long 50 BTC and pay 4.19% in funding.

**The Math:**
This locks in approximately a 1.2% spread between the two positions, with funding costs essentially frozen. Your directional risk cancels out while you're capturing the funding rate differential.

It's a solid example of how cross-platform rate spreads create actual trading opportunities if you can execute efficiently across venues.

BTC3,18%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 01-10 07:06

1.2% spread sounds good, but how much can actually be earned in practice...

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 01-10 01:19

A 1.2% spread sounds okay, but during actual execution, slippage and gas can eat up half of it. I'm serious.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-07 17:05

ngl this 1.2% locked spread feels like the old days when arbs actually paid... but yeah, execution across venues is the real grind here. slippage will eat you alive if you're not careful lol

Reply0

AirdropCollector

· 01-07 17:04

This arbitrage strategy is indeed excellent, with a stable 1.2% return locked in. The difficulty lies in execution efficiency—placing orders across platforms simultaneously, even slightly slower, can result in losing the price difference.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleSurfer

· 01-07 17:04

A 1.2% spread sounds good, but in actual operation... cross-platform latency and slippage can eat up half of it, right? --- I get this logic, but who cares? Retail investors simply can't play at this level of arbitrage. --- Wait, why make it so complicated... isn't it better to just borrow coins to short? --- Funding rate arbitrage is unbeatable; the problem is whether the trading counterparties are deep enough. --- Haha, this is what institutions do every day. No wonder retail investors can't make money. --- It seems easy to say but hard to do; when actually executing, various costs can directly wipe out this profit. --- Is 1.2% worth all this fuss? I'd rather wait for an airdrop.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind