2026-01-07 05:30:35

#2026年比特币行情展望 The two recent events are worth paying close attention to.

First, Federal Reserve officials collectively signaling that this year they will cut interest rates by over 100 basis points. What has this changed? It has altered the market pricing logic. Previously, the discussion was about whether to cut rates; now it’s about how much to cut. The liquidity environment is indeed shifting towards easing.

Second, the US banking sector officially includes crypto assets in its standard asset allocation recommendations, assigning a 4% allocation weight. This is very significant. Four percent may seem modest, but relative to the trillion-dollar scale of traditional asset management, it’s a clear compliance entry signal. No longer just retail investors’ self-indulgence, but institutions are starting to seriously calculate how much they can allocate.

From a data perspective, $BTC and $ETH ’s recent gains are indeed supported by fundamentals. Bitcoin surged from over 80,000 to 93,000, which is just the initial stage of institutional allocation. Historically, markets led by institutions tend to be more sustainable, although they may also be more volatile.

However, there are a few points to be cautious about. Institutional funds habitually flow into highly liquid assets, which means top-tier coins may receive focused attention, while smaller coins are easily overlooked. Secondly, the volatility structure of this cycle will change; it won’t be as linear as in the past driven by retail investors, and there may be phases of sideways movement or even pullbacks. Leverage trading is especially risky at this stage; a single fluctuation could wipe out accounts.

In practical terms, here are some suggestions. First, focus on core assets that are more likely to enter institutional portfolios. Second, build positions gradually to avoid full exposure at the top. Third, keep tracking the progress of compliance channels—actual capital inflows depend on whether these channels are open.

Another issue worth reflecting on: how far can this dual-engine drive (macro liquidity + institutional allocation) push the market? Will Bitcoin’s target price break through 150,000 or even 250,000? Which direction do institutions favor more—Bitcoin ecosystem, Ethereum ecosystem, or the RWA track? Can your current holdings withstand the volatility that institutional market movements might bring? These are questions you need to think through carefully.

BTC-0,03%

ETH0,17%

RWA1,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusDissenter

· 23h ago

A 4% allocation weight for institutions sounds solidified, but whether real funds will flow in depends on subsequent implementation. Really avoid leverage this time; I've already seen people around me get wiped out in the volatility. 150,000 to 250,000? That's a bit of a stretch. Right now, it still depends on how much the Federal Reserve's 100bp rate cut can actually deliver. Core assets are indeed the focus; small-cap coins might have to fall behind this time. Gradual building of positions is a reliable suggestion; going all-in at the top is just gambling.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiWarrior

· 01-08 02:14

Institutional allocation at 4% sounds slow, but when you calculate the trillion-level scale, this is real money entering the market. --- Interest rate cuts over 100 basis points? Liquidity easing is real, but I’m just worried it might be another illusion of prosperity. --- The advice to build positions gradually is spot on. Going all-in at once might just get wiped out by institutional volatility. --- The question is, should small-cap coins really be completely ignored? Or does this time’s institutional entry have a new approach? --- Is 93,000 just the initial stage? Then jumping to 150,000 or 250,000—might that be a bit too optimistic? --- Leverage trading at this point is basically suicide. I’m currently just holding pure spot and relaxing. --- Are institutions really optimistic about the RWA track? Compared to the Bitcoin ecosystem, it feels like the buzz is just not enough. --- If the compliance channels are blocked, no matter how much capital there is, it can’t get in. Does this logic make sense? --- The volatility in the institutional market will be even more intense. My biggest concern now is whether the account structure can withstand it. --- From retail enthusiasm to institutional serious calculations, this shift is actually quite ironic. Our game rules are changing.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 01-07 06:00

Institutions entering at 4% may not sound like much, but it means real money is coming in. Compared to retail investors' emotional swings, I'm actually more worried about institutions' cold and calculated withdrawals. --- Cut interest rates by over 100 basis points? Liquidity easing is a good thing, but the problem is that this money still flows to top-tier coins. Small altcoins should really be cleared out. --- Is 93,000 just the beginning? Wait, are the targets of 150,000 and 250,000 a bit too optimistic? --- Playing with leverage in this kind of market is playing with fire. One fluctuation and the account is gone. I've seen too many stories like this. --- Opening up compliance channels is the key. Just watching the news is useless; you need to see if real money is actually coming in. --- Market volatility for institutions will be different. Previously, it followed retail investor sentiment; now, it depends on how big funds operate. --- The advice to build positions gradually is reliable. Don't think about precise bottom-fishing—that's self-deception. --- Is the BTC ecosystem or the ETH ecosystem more favored by institutions? You need to reflect on your holdings.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 01-07 06:00

Institutional 4% allocation weight looks insignificant, but when you calculate the account size, it’s shocking. Wait, could it be that the recent leverage wipeout is still us retail investors? Really, the phrase "building positions in batches" hits the mark. Fully loaded at the top truly has no prospects. 150,000 or 250,000, it all depends on whether the Federal Reserve’s 100 basis points can truly be implemented. Is the RWA track the next hunting ground for institutions? It seems like no one is seriously laying out a plan.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 01-07 05:56

Institutional entry is just like this. People wait until the wave is rising before wanting to get on board; it should have been prepared long ago. Avoid leverage, really. One retracement and the account is gone. Where BTC can go, 150,000 or 250,000, honestly, I have no idea. Small coins have indeed been marginalized, it's sad. It's right to build positions gradually; going all-in at the top just waiting for liquidation. The RWA track is interesting; it might be the next hotspot. Liquidity has shifted, it really feels different. The leading coins are indeed resilient; institutions only recognize these. Is the compliance channel open? It all depends on how much capital flows in. To put it simply, that's how it is.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-07 05:53

Institutional allocation at 4% may seem insignificant, but it really means the game has changed. Be careful, leverage brothers. --- Wait, is this move by US banks serious? Or just another compliance show? --- The advice to build positions gradually is crucial. We really can't repeat last year's lesson of going all-in at once. --- Is it possible for the dual engines to push to 250,000? Or am I overthinking it? --- Top cryptocurrencies are indeed stable, but I feel there are still opportunities with smaller coins. It all depends on who notices the next move by institutions first. --- This round of volatility could be much more intense than before. Account structure needs to be adjusted in advance. --- A rate cut of over 100 basis points is not a dream. Liquidity is really flowing into crypto. Things feel different. --- Is the RWA track really favored by institutions, or is it just media hype?

View OriginalReply0

SandwichVictim

· 01-07 05:52

Institutional 4% allocation weight sounds great, but what if they all run away collectively? --- Cutting interest rates by over 100 basis points sounds great, but it's actually digging a hole for leveraged traders. --- The idea of building positions in batches is too standard; in reality, most people still chase after the high. --- 150,000 to 250,000? Friend, stop dreaming. Volatility can wipe you out. --- BTC at 93,000 is just the early stage, so when will the climax come... --- It's true that leading coins are popular, but don't completely give up on opportunities in smaller coins. --- Once leverage is opened, it can't be controlled. When institutions come in, they really know how to play to wipe out retail investors. --- Talking about RWA in this track is still too early; we haven't seen any capital inflow. --- Will the compliance channels really open, or is it just another harvest? --- Can the holding structure withstand it? Mine has already been chopped into pieces.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-07 05:48

Institutional entry is indeed different, but the real test is just beginning. Leverage at this stage is truly playing with fire; some people around me have already been liquidated. Is Bitcoin reaching 25w just wishful thinking or is it really possible? It depends on how much real money the Federal Reserve can pump in. Head coins are for eating meat, while small coins are indeed awkward and hard to sustain. The point about building positions in batches is spot on; the greedy outcome is being shaken out. Is anyone really going all-in on the RWA track? I haven't decided yet. It's really hard to say how long this liquidity dividend can last.

View OriginalReply0