We ended up filtering out quite a lot of people through our screening process. Looking back, some rejections probably came down to what I'd call "AI-assisted slop"—not full-blown bot spam, but accounts that were clearly using AI to generate or heavily polish their tweets. It's an interesting gray area in the community right now. People aren't technically breaking rules, but the vibe feels off when you spot it. Hard to say if we were too strict or if the bar for authentic engagement should just be higher across the board.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RumbleValidatorvip
· 01-10 03:08
AI-generated content should have been restricted long ago; otherwise, can it still be called a community? The verification mechanism needs to be upgraded.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 01-09 21:17
The AI-generated copy is indeed disgusting, but the real problem is that some people are still pretending.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBrovip
· 01-09 21:08
Tweets generated by AI can really be detected; that suspicious vibe just doesn't feel right.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBotvip
· 01-07 05:58
It's really hard to judge whether AI polishing tweets are genuine or fake. How do you determine their authenticity?
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Foodvip
· 01-07 05:58
Tweets polished by AI can really be spotted at a glance, it feels just like chatting with a machine.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)