2026-01-07 04:25:29

There's been plenty of speculation around those large wallets, but here's the reality: a couple of them are actually staking and reward distribution wallets for the protocol. That's been causing unnecessary noise in the community. The mechanics are pretty straightforward—a portion of the rewards gets recycled back into the market through buybacks, which explains why you see consistent dev purchases. It's all part of the designed tokenomics, not what some of the FUD makes it out to be.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_fee_trauma

· 6h ago

Someone finally said it: those large wallet addresses are actually the protocol's staking and distribution addresses, just a bunch of people guessing blindly...

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 22h ago

Coming back to blame the big wallet holders? Please stop the cover-up; the market has already seen through it.

View OriginalReply0

ArbitrageBot

· 01-08 15:56

They really treat staking wallets as money laundering, this wave of community FUD is indeed outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-08 15:02

I've already said it, the group of big wallet holders are just guessing blindly. The truth is that simple.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-07 04:55

After looking for a while, is the large wallet actually the protocol's own? It should have been clarified a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

LucidSleepwalker

· 01-07 04:53

Someone should have said this earlier; those people are just guessing blindly.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainOracle

· 01-07 04:45

Honestly, I've been tired of those people talking nonsense about whale wallets. It turns out they are all about staking and distribution. No wonder there's always buybacks. Now I don't have to be brainwashed by FUD.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-07 04:43

Haha, someone finally said it. I've been wanting to correct this misconception for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-07 04:42

empirically speaking, the data suggests this narrative conveniently glosses over incentive alignment issues. where's the on-chain transparency? token-weighted voting doesn't solve this either tbh

Reply0

SilentAlpha

· 01-07 04:36

This explanation finally woke up my friends who were lying flat. When bottom fishing, don't just listen to FUD.

View OriginalReply0