2026-01-07 04:23:59

AI making decisions for us has become the norm, but this also means that there can be no compromise on accuracy — it is the foundational layer of the entire system.

Projects like Mira are fundamentally solving this problem. The key idea is straightforward: instead of patching the errors of AI after the fact, it’s better to move the verification step to the front. Every output from AI must undergo rigorous validation, and only results that pass verification are truly executed.

This front-end validation mechanism changes the game rules. It ensures that in the Web3 ecosystem, automated decisions do not become "black box risks," but are instead transparent, trustworthy, and controllable. This is especially critical for scenarios like DeFi and on-chain automated trading — a single incorrect AI judgment could directly mean a loss of funds.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeSmellHunter

· 01-08 16:53

Rather than relying on post-event strategists, it's better to get things right upfront. This idea is still somewhat interesting. It seems that Mira's pre-validation in DeFi can indeed stop the bleeding; otherwise, an AI bug could lead to total loss... But on the other hand, does this validation step itself become a new bottleneck?

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 01-07 04:53

Pre-verification is indeed a tough approach, much more reliable than blaming others after the fact. In DeFi, a single bug can lead to total loss; it's essential to move the checkpoints further upstream. If Mira can truly achieve transparency and controllability, then it has identified a key pain point. But honestly, no matter how advanced the underlying technology is, it only counts if someone actually uses it. Verification mechanisms sound great, but I'm worried they might become another black box. What Web3 most lacks is honest risk management solutions like this. Finally, someone is taking the accuracy of AI seriously.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-07 04:36

Pre-validation is indeed a solid approach, much more reliable than blaming others after the fact. --- The black box of AI decision-making has always bothered me. Mira's approach is truly thoughtful. --- Wait, doesn't this validation mechanism itself have the potential to fail? It still feels like just shifting the risk around. --- In DeFi, a bug can mean losing everything. Pre-validation really should become standard, otherwise how can we be confident? --- It sounds good in theory, but the key is how it's implemented. Theoretical ideas are always more beautiful than practical ones. --- Finally, some projects have realized this issue. The previous ad-hoc fixes were just a joke.

View OriginalReply0

NftRegretMachine

· 01-07 04:34

Preliminary validation of this idea is okay, but honestly, it still depends on how well the execution is done. Don't just talk about it on paper.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-07 04:25

Pre-verification is indeed a powerful approach, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Isn't it all about manual review and exhausting effort?

View OriginalReply0