2026-01-07 04:23:47

Google has enabled a new domain name, which is simple and easy to remember. But what truly deserves attention is the underlying shift in logic—the search box paradigm that has been used for 30 years is being broken. From inputting keywords to obtaining results, this interaction model is about to face a comprehensive impact from AI modes. As natural language conversations gradually replace precise searches, the entire entry point for information access is being redefined. This paradigm update not only affects search engines but also triggers chain reactions in various information services such as fintech and trading platforms. AI-driven personalized recommendations and intelligent Q&A are quietly changing people's habits of obtaining information.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-10 03:41

NGL, this thing should have been changed a long time ago. Who can still tolerate the same old 30-year-old approach... But I still have some doubts about fully betting on AI conversations. What if it starts making things up?

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-10 02:03

The search paradigm has undergone a major reshuffle, but to be honest, the biggest impact on retail investors is still the access to trading information. Be cautious with AI recommendations.

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 01-09 23:08

Keyword search, this old-fashioned method really should retire. AI conversations are the future. Who will be eliminated in this big reshuffle of search engines is still uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-07 04:53

Well said, the search paradigm is really about to change, and this wave of AI conversation is truly a blow to the traditional approach.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-07 04:53

To be honest, the search box is really outdated. AI conversations are much more enjoyable now. Google's recent shift is quite aggressive, and the fintech sector is probably going to follow suit.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-07 04:50

The wave of transformation in search engines has long been overdue. The traditional keyword search approach is really outdated. However, what I am optimistic about is not Google, but rather those exchanges and DeFi platforms that can integrate AI conversations. If they truly seize this opportunity, allowing information retrieval to directly influence trading decisions, that will be a real paradigm shift.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSauceMaster

· 01-07 04:44

Ha, it's the same AI script again, sounding just like the real thing. But what I care more about is whether using natural language will distort my search intent. If it all ends up being the recommendation algorithm's way, it's not as good as precise search.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 01-07 04:44

ngl, the domain rebrand is kinda missing the point here. what actually matters is whether their nlp stack can actually *validate* intent correctly or if we're just getting hallucinated answers wrapped in conversational ui... requires further auditing tbh

Reply0

MetaverseHomeless

· 01-07 04:33

Hey, wait a minute. Is searching for this thing really going to be eliminated by the chat box now? So all the years I've spent developing my search habits will be wasted...

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 01-07 04:28

Honestly, the new domain name isn't really important. The key is that the search logic is really about to change dramatically. Wait, will AI conversations replace precise search? I still trust keyword search more; AI recommendations seem easier to be biased. Fintech will indeed experience turbulence, but can trading platforms really rely on conversations to execute trades? Not really eager to try. This wave of paradigm shift puts quite a bit of pressure on small developers.

View OriginalReply0