Recently, a seasoned analyst proposed an interesting perspective: why does the launch of a Bitcoin ETF generate such a huge response? Many people may overlook a few key points.
First, from the perspective of market capacity, there is a hidden underlying demand that far exceeds industry expectations. A leading investment bank launched a Bitcoin ETF that became the fastest product in history to reach a scale of $80 billion, but even so, this institution is still expanding its layout. What does this signal? The market is far from saturated, and we are still in the very early stages.
Second, this is not just a commercial move but also a strategic signal. When traditional financial giants allocate assets to a certain asset, their considerations often go beyond simple product competition. The importance of Bitcoin in clients' minds—whether from an economic perspective or social recognition—is becoming a reality that financial institutions must face. Even if this product ultimately does not become a blockbuster, the brand value and market influence it brings are significant enough.
Third, understanding the essence is a defensive strategy. In a scenario where liquidity is highly concentrated, why do these institutions still push their own products? The answer is simple: controlling distribution channels is the key. Clients are not following the best products but trusted channels.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFT_Therapy
· 01-10 00:18
Uh... $80 billion, I feel like the demand has been underestimated. Traditional finance really can't sit still anymore.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-07 17:00
$80 billion was built so quickly, showing that the market is truly eager
To put it simply, channels are king; whoever controls distribution wins
This round is definitely a defensive move by financial giants; it's hard to deny
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-07 04:43
$80 billion is just the appetizer; the real big part is still to come.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 01-07 04:43
In simple terms, traditional finance is fighting for position; whoever secures the channels first will win.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 01-07 04:32
Still the same old tricks... We've been talking about the channel being king for a few years, and what’s the result? Do these traditional institutions really understand on-chain logic now? Not necessarily.
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 01-07 04:28
$80 billion isn't even saturated? This is just the beginning, the anxiety from traditional finance hits hard.
Recently, a seasoned analyst proposed an interesting perspective: why does the launch of a Bitcoin ETF generate such a huge response? Many people may overlook a few key points.
First, from the perspective of market capacity, there is a hidden underlying demand that far exceeds industry expectations. A leading investment bank launched a Bitcoin ETF that became the fastest product in history to reach a scale of $80 billion, but even so, this institution is still expanding its layout. What does this signal? The market is far from saturated, and we are still in the very early stages.
Second, this is not just a commercial move but also a strategic signal. When traditional financial giants allocate assets to a certain asset, their considerations often go beyond simple product competition. The importance of Bitcoin in clients' minds—whether from an economic perspective or social recognition—is becoming a reality that financial institutions must face. Even if this product ultimately does not become a blockbuster, the brand value and market influence it brings are significant enough.
Third, understanding the essence is a defensive strategy. In a scenario where liquidity is highly concentrated, why do these institutions still push their own products? The answer is simple: controlling distribution channels is the key. Clients are not following the best products but trusted channels.