#以太坊大户持仓变化 The Federal Reserve's New Regulatory Approach



Recently, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell explicitly stated in public that he supports banking institutions gradually entering the cryptocurrency sector within a framework that strictly adheres to current regulations and effectively manages risks. His core logic is clear: rather than allowing the traditional financial system to become disconnected from emerging technologies, it’s better to proactively embrace innovation and set the rules of the game.

But here’s a key point—the need for any innovation to give way to financial stability. Powell emphasized that the resilience of the banking system and the integrity of the deposit insurance system are bottom lines that cannot be compromised in pursuit of trends.

In other words, the attitude of regulatory authorities has shifted from "blocking" to "permitting." It’s no longer about suppressing the development of cryptocurrencies but integrating them into the mainstream ecosystem. This means there will be clear industry standards, transparent approval processes, and predictable policy environments in the future.

From a market perspective, this signal is quite significant. Once traditional financial institutions receive clear cues to participate, the influx into the crypto market will no longer be just retail hot money but potentially long-term institutional allocations. The nature of this capital is entirely different—no chasing hot trends, no speculative hype, only focusing on fundamentals and long-term value.

Therefore, the next thing to watch is how the supporting policies and detailed rules will be implemented. With the policy framework clarified, how will the execution follow through? That’s the key to determining the true direction of the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-10 03:28
Powell's move this time is really easy to praise, but isn't he just trying to get a share of the pie? When the detailed rules are announced, we'll just get wool pulled over our eyes again.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 01-10 03:27
Basically, traditional finance just wants to cut our leeks, it's just a different skin. Institutions entering the market sounds great, but in reality? We still have to listen to regulatory daddy. The implementation of detailed rules is just the beginning of the joke. What's the difference between blocking and easing? It's still the same old story with a different soup. Listen to what Powell says, but when it comes to actual execution, it's a different matter. Bottom line? Ha, financial stability will never be our bottom line. When big institutions really start to enter en masse, retail investors should just run. Long-term allocation sounds good, but the problem is, their long-term and our long-term are fundamentally not the same concept. If regulatory attitudes change, how can we, the old leeks, survive?
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 01-09 22:52
I've heard this set of words about "stuck rotation" several times, but the key still lies in how the detailed rules are written and whether the banks really dare to step in.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSicklevip
· 01-08 04:46
Here comes the trick to lure retail investors to buy in again; institutional funds have already quietly accumulated positions before entering the market.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiacvip
· 01-07 03:58
Powell's recent moves have really shifted direction, from suppression to embrace, looking quite promising... I'm just worried it might be all talk, and when the details come out, it'll be a different story...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63bvip
· 01-07 03:56
Powell's recent moves are quite interesting; shifting from tightening to easing is indeed a major turnaround. But frankly, it all depends on how the details are implemented. It sounds good on paper, but who knows how it will play out in practice.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAllvip
· 01-07 03:55
Powell's rhetoric sounds good, but it's all talk until the actual details are released. If institutional funds are really going to enter the market, we'll have to wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-07 03:49
Basically, the "mainstream forces" are here, and the wild days for retail investors might have to change.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchainvip
· 01-07 03:36
Bro, at the end of the day, traditional finance is finally entering the scene, and this time it's really different. Wait, will they really follow the rules? I'm still a bit skeptical. Institutional entry sounds good, but don't get cut again. Wow, from suppression to embrace, turning around so quickly? I find it hard to believe. No matter how nicely it's said, it's still the same old story. Let's see how it's executed. Ethereum whales are probably going to have to recalculate their accounts again.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 01-07 03:31
Ultimately, it still depends on how the rules are written. Just saying support is useless...
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt