2026-01-07 02:30:25

A rising project just hit some impressive milestones—over 400% subscription overdemand and $10M+ in committed funds for its public sale. Here's what caught everyone's attention: the token allocation is fully liquid from day one, with zero lock-up at TGE. The market's buzzing about whether this "instant unlock" approach might become the new norm. Does it change how investors evaluate token projects, or is it just a short-term edge in a crowded fundraising space?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleInTraining

· 01-08 14:48

Hey, this instant unlock really dares to play, probably going to cause a dump. This data looks good, but I'm just worried that too much liquidity might be hard to control. Unlocking so quickly feels like an upgrade in the financing strategy. A 400% oversubscription sounds impressive, but no lock-in is really a double-edged sword. They can sell right after issuance, the project team is quite aggressive. Suddenly I remember a certain project last time, same strategy, and the result was... Is the era of no lock-in here? What should investors do? They need to be more cautious. This move either shows the project team’s full confidence or they just want to cut quickly. Promising more funds to be returned, but the real test is still to come.

View OriginalReply0

BlockImposter

· 01-07 03:00

This tactic... you can just dump without locking, and then cut and run after selling the tokens? What happened to long-term holding, haha? A 400% oversubscription sounds great, but it turned green right after TGE... just wait and see. Immediate unlocking means early investors simply cash out and leave, while later investors become the bagholders. It's not a new normal at all; it's just the project team using hype marketing to attract attention.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-07 02:59

400% subscription? Sounds good, but I really don't dare to take on tokens that are not locked. Instant unlock sounds like a suicidal form of fundraising. Are these project teams trying to test the market? The new normal? It's just an illusion created by the competition for fundraising. For projects without a lock-up period, I usually stay on the sidelines; it's too easy to be dumped on. Frankly, this kind of operation is like drinking poison to quench thirst. The short-term appeal will only deplete long-term credibility. Would truly solid projects be in such a rush to dump all their tokens?

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 01-07 02:38

400% over-collateralization? Sounds intense, but if it's not locked in, are you really willing to buy... --- Instant unlocking sounds great, but it's really just gambling on the broker's conscience --- Another financing trick, even if the hype dies down, they still dump, I've seen too many cases --- No lock-in = no sincerity, this logic isn't wrong, right everyone? --- Ten times the hype for a bit of stress relief, there's still some value there --- Booming financing ≠ a reliable project, honestly I don't believe it --- With such fierce competition now, you can't raise money without some tricks --- No lock-in sounds like an advantage, but in reality, it's just a trap

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-07 02:38

400% subscription... At first glance, this number seems impressive, but without a lock-up period, I actually feel a bit uneasy. Is instant unlocking really a blessing, or is it a trap waiting to happen? Honestly, no lock-up can attract retail investors, but it also risks a sell-off. Is this really the norm? I want to see how far it can go from here.

View OriginalReply0