A recent regulatory case involving an exchange is worth noting. A licensed financial platform was heavily fined 4 million yuan for illegal distribution of virtual asset products on online platforms—this case exposed common vulnerabilities in risk control and customer protection among many exchanges.



From November 2018 to November 2022, the platform allowed customers to directly buy and sell virtual asset derivatives online. After investigation, regulators found that the platform executed 1,446 transactions involving 32 virtual asset products, including 130 retail investors and 6 professional investors. More seriously, 21 of these 32 products were exchange-traded derivatives—highly complex financial instruments.

Where did the problem lie? The platform neither properly assessed customers’ investment knowledge nor provided clear risk warnings and sufficient product disclosures. For high-risk derivatives, this approach clearly violated regulatory guidelines—the investor suitability principle was essentially ignored. This case serves as a reminder to exchanges and platform operators that merely listing products is far from enough; selling suitable products to suitable people and providing proper risk disclosures are the fundamental requirements.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
EthMaximalistvip
· 16h ago
A fine of 4 million is still too light; this kind of reckless growth should have been stopped long ago.
View OriginalReply0
BoredRiceBallvip
· 01-09 12:18
A fine of 4 million is nothing. This kind of risk control loophole should have been fixed long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTroopervip
· 01-07 02:53
Same old tricks again? 130 retail investors got fleeced, the platform plays dead, and even after regulatory fines they're still running the same old playbook.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 01-07 02:51
It's the same old story; thinking about it still makes me uncomfortable. A fine of 4 million yuan isn't a big deal to them; they've already earned back the profit.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 01-07 02:50
4 million yuan fine? This is just the tip of the iceberg... --- Again, selling derivatives without doing KYC, this trick is so old. --- 130 retail investors playing with 21 types of ETPs, isn't this asking for death? --- Exchanges with virtually no risk control should have been shut down long ago; cleaning up some won't hurt. --- The main issue is that many platforms treat compliance as a decoration; is compliance really that costly? --- Honestly, it's all about boosting trading volume, regardless of how investors end up. --- This case reminds me of a few exchanges from two years ago... what’s happened to them now? --- DYOR is really old news, but platforms have to take responsibility for it, no way around it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunstervip
· 01-07 02:48
What lesson did 4 million yuan in fines teach? Platform: I will never dare again. Retail investors: We've known for a long time. --- Laughing to death, 130 retail investors are being used as professionals to sell derivatives, this is called "investor adaptability," right? --- Using retail investors as big players to cut profits, and not providing risk warnings—this operation gets a full score from me. --- Risk control is virtually non-existent, and the adaptability principle is just for show. This is basically giving retail investors a warm hug. --- 1446 transactions, 4 years of bare-bones operation—this platform is really bold. --- The problem is the risk control loophole, fundamentally—who still cares about small retail investors, right?
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 01-07 02:48
It's the same old story, pushing small retail investors into deep pits and still calling it market freedom.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420vip
· 01-07 02:30
A fine of 4 million is not enough; these platforms should be shut down directly.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 01-07 02:25
Ah, 4 million in fines... To be honest, I knew someone would mess up eventually. The crypto world goes through cycles every three years, and history always repeats itself. Not conducting risk control reviews for four years? That's really bold. No wonder you got caught.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)