2026-01-07 01:24:28

Recently came across a yield-bearing token project with an interesting mechanism design. The total tax rate is 3%, and the specific distribution plan is as follows — 1% directly distributed to token holders (automatically credited in WBNB), the remaining 0.75% goes into an infinite burn pool (continuous deflation), another 0.75% flows back into the liquidity pool for support, and finally, 0.5% is used for community marketing and promotion.

The key point is that the holding threshold isn't high; holding at least 10,000 tokens enables you to activate the permanent mining mode, with dividends automatically settled without manual operation. I checked the dividend contract (0xb63a41e1b03a2ce86f05c9c7f172c77d22b2985b), which clearly shows the allocation flow.

From the tokenomics perspective, this structure balances token holder benefits, market liquidity, and price support. The burn mechanism provides long-term benefits, liquidity backing reduces risk, and dividends attract long-term holders. The token contract address is 0xc0aecee93c57f4e370b657df4018d7e09ace7777. Feel free to research it further if you're interested.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletWhisperer

· 01-10 01:21

The 10,000 token threshold is indeed not high; I'm just worried that there might be another old script of "pumping and dumping" later on. --- Wait, burn + liquidity backing + dividends, this setup sounds too perfect, gotta be careful. --- The contract looks fine, but the key is whether the community has popularity; otherwise, no matter how good the mechanism is, it's useless. --- WBNB automatic dividends? I have to admit, this is a bit interesting, much more convenient than manual operation. --- Another project with a 3% tax rate, can this kind of gameplay still attract people now? Feels a bit like a routine. --- Mining starts at 10,000 tokens, what’s the price? That’s the real key. --- Liquidity backing sounds reassuring, but does this thing work during a downtrend? --- Infinite deflation in the burn pool... I've heard too many promises like this, what happened in the end? --- I just want to know how much the project team took for themselves; no matter how good the rest sounds, it’s useless.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 01-09 14:37

10,000 tokens threshold is indeed not high, but few can really hold until the dividends --- Burn + liquidity + dividends, three-pronged approach, feels like a serious project --- Automatic settlement is really爽, saves the trouble of manual操作 --- 3% tax rate is considered mild, unlike some projects that cut deeply --- Just worried it might be another "beautiful design, actual collapse" story --- Contract公开 this part is okay, at least敢晒 data --- Holding tokens for dividends sounds美, liquidity support才是真正能救命的 --- Low threshold容易冲, but the ones who really make money are always those who enter early --- Unlimited burn听着不错, just看执行力咋样吧

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 01-09 01:45

The threshold of 10,000 coins is quite a clever design. Automatic dividends require no effort, and activities like arbitrage are quite rare.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 01-08 00:35

Oh wow, this mechanism looks quite smooth, but a threshold of 10,000 tokens isn't exactly low.

View OriginalReply0

RektButAlive

· 01-07 01:51

Is the 10,000 tokens threshold really low, or am I just too poor haha --- If the contract is transparent, I wouldn't worry too much. Run the data yourself and be assured --- The combination of burning + dividends is now everywhere, but the key still depends on the actual trading volume --- Permanent mining sounds great, but how much WBNB can you actually cash out? --- Talking about liquidity support sounds nice, but when there's a dump, the first to run are the LPs --- Another project with a 3% tax, I saw this mechanism design last year --- 1% directly distributed in WBNB? That depends on the number of holders; if the denominator is too large, it's pointless --- Checked the contract, it's definitely more conscientious than some projects, but the risk is still high --- The problem is, is the liquidity really sufficient? It feels like a big holder could just dump and break the support

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 01-07 01:51

10,000 tokens threshold... How much would that cost? Can someone really earn dividends from it?

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-07 01:48

The 10,000 threshold is indeed user-friendly, but I wonder how long this burn pool can last. The automatic dividend settlement is a good feature, saving the hassle of manual claiming every day. The key to projects like this still depends on the team's ongoing operations; no matter how good the mechanism is, someone has to maintain it. It feels like the distribution ratio leans a bit towards marketing? 0.5% promotion is a bit high. Liquidity backing sounds good, but can it really be a bottom? That depends on the actual trading volume.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-07 01:44

10,000 tokens threshold is really not high, automatic dividends are quite lazy-friendly --- Burn + dividends + liquidity backing, this combo is okay, just worried about management running away later --- The contract is checked so thoroughly, this guy is serious --- 3% total tax sounds moderate, but it depends on whether the actual dividend ratio can beat it --- Permanent mining sounds great, but the key is that there must be continuous new inflows to be effective --- This design has a strong standardized template feel, but the mechanism itself is logically sound --- Automatic dividends are indeed comfortable, saving the hassle of manual operations every day --- The liquidity backing part is well done, at least providing a bottom line during sell-offs

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 01-07 01:33

10,000 tokens to start mining? The threshold isn't high, but how long can the burn pool last... --- Automatic dividends sound great, but I'm worried it's just the old trick of cutting the leeks again --- Regarding liquidity backing, I want to ask, who guarantees that the bottom won't suddenly disappear? --- A 3% total tax rate seems "considerate," but in reality, nine out of ten projects like this run away --- I just want to know if there's a big player secretly lurking in the early stages... --- Hmm, checking the contract data reveals the details, but I’m too lazy to verify haha --- Burn deflation + dividend dual bait, a classic Ponzi scheme, everyone --- They talk a lot of fancy stuff, but the key is when will the liquidity of the trading pair be withdrawn --- Anyway, just play around with entertainment finance, don't expect to get rich --- No matter how many dividends token holders get, they first have to survive the next wave of air tokens

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 01-07 01:31

It sounds great, but I'm scared... A threshold of 10,000 tokens is usually just the standard for bagholders. 0.75% liquidity backing? I believed in that explanation last time and got liquidated directly, losing more quickly than any dividends. The burn mechanism is good, but who cares when the price drops? I just want to ask how this 1% WBNB is distributed. Could it be another case of looking good on paper but lacking real substance? Feels like another "dividend automatic settlement" gimmick. I can't escape projects like this every time; I've suffered too many losses. The contract is indeed verifiable, but I've really learned to be smarter... I won't go all-in on low-threshold tokens again. The fate of bottom-fishing should be matched with a willingness to die trying.

View OriginalReply0