2026-01-07 01:24:03

The CONS project, after experiencing a team restructuring, is now operated voluntarily by community participants and officially launched a new phase in 2026.

Regarding the project's fundamentals, the total supply remains at 1 million tokens, with over 520,000 tokens already burned. The trading mechanism adopts a 1.5% low-slippage design, supporting unlimited splitting, with 1% continuously burned to promote scarcity, and the remaining 0.5% allocated to the community marketing ecosystem.

In terms of operations, the new operational team comprises experienced professionals who are focused on resolving historical issues and laying a foundation for the project's long-term development. Data shows that in the short term, the number of genuine token holder addresses has approached 30,000 and continues to grow rapidly, with community activity steadily increasing.

In 2026, the project team plans to establish CONS as an industry benchmark project. Early supporters have committed to locking in 900 tokens, while new participants in the cycle will adopt a model of locking 500 tokens through self-purchase and 1500 tokens via soft lock, with functions for community governance and service sharing. The project team stated that they are recruiting community members with organizational skills and a willingness to contribute to jointly promote ecosystem development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CountdownToBroke

· 01-09 22:09

Burning 520,000 coins with this momentum... really depends on whether they can stabilize in the follow-up.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-07 01:49

30,000 addresses? You need to check the on-chain footprint—are these wallets active or dormant? 9,000 early locked tokens vs 500+1,500 in the new mode; the fund flow is quite interesting. After team adjustments, they cleaned up legacy issues... Just listen, no changes were mentioned at the contract level. The key point is where the 0.5% community marketing ecosystem funds ultimately went. 520,000 tokens were burned—need to verify whether they were truly burned or just sent to a black hole address.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-07 01:46

honestly the 52% burn rate looks decent on paper but let me see the actual contract code first... "community-driven" usually means someone's dumping bags while we're all cheering, ngl

Reply0

BridgeNomad

· 01-07 01:35

1.5% slippage on a community-led pivot? seen this movie before, mate. hope they've actually audited the burn mechanics this time.

Reply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-07 01:34

Community self-rescue projects are now popular... 520,000 burns sound good, but 30,000 addresses need to work harder. --- 900 tokens locked? We really made a killing in the early days. Our new arrivals have to buy back in; a bit stubborn. --- Low slippage of 1.5% is indeed friendly, but I don't know how far this wave can go. --- Experienced practitioners cleaning up the mess... Just listen, the key is whether there will be real action later. --- Building a benchmark project by 2026? First, double the community size and then talk. --- Speaking of which, the real addresses are almost 30,000. The growth rate is pretty good; not as dead as I imagined. --- Recruit organizers? So they just want the community to do the work, got it.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 01-07 01:27

The new team taking over still feels somewhat promising, and the destruction mechanism design is quite reasonable. --- Community self-management? I've seen this trick too many times. The key still depends on the upcoming execution. --- Rapid growth to 30,000 addresses is impressive, but it's hard to measure genuine engagement. --- Another set of lock-up models, the early investors earned the most, which is a long-standing tradition. --- It's nice to hear about clearing historical issues, but we'll have to wait and see how they actually do it. --- Industry benchmark project... The more enthusiastically such goals are announced, the more likely they are to fall short. Don't set the bar too high. --- A low slippage of 1.5% is indeed friendly, but beware of people exploiting arbitrage to scalp profits. --- Recruiting community members with organizational skills is good; it's definitely better than just hype.

View OriginalReply0