【Crypto World】An investment bank recently released a prediction about US cryptocurrency legislation, which could disrupt many people’s expectations.
In simple terms, the path to legislation regulating the crypto market in the US might be longer than expected. According to the latest report from TD Cowen, if this bill is to pass Congress, it may have to wait until 2027, with actual implementation possibly pushed back to 2029.
Why the delay? Ultimately, it’s political game-playing. The report points out that although there is still a chance to push the bill this year, the Democrats currently have little motivation to accelerate this process. The reason is simple—they are eyeing the 2026 midterm elections, hoping to regain control of the House. Under this calculation, why rush to legislate now? It might be better to wait until the election results are clear.
However, the investment bank also mentioned that this situation is not absolute. Democrats have actually hinted that if both sides sit down to talk, an agreement could be reached quickly—after all, staff have been working on technical details for several months, and many specifics are already known. Time is on the side of the bill because as long as it passes by 2027 and takes effect in 2029, the matter will be settled.
But a more realistic issue is on the table: the crypto industry must accept that the presidential election could change the final rules; meanwhile, Democrats also need to accept that regulations like conflict of interest clauses may not apply to everyone. Politics is like that—rules often vary from person to person.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeadTrades_Walking
· 01-08 22:39
2027? We'll have to wait until 2027 for legislation, this political chess game is really slow.
Political maneuvering, to put it nicely, is mutual checks and balances; to put it bluntly, it's mutual obstruction, and the crypto industry is being used as a bargaining chip.
But on the other hand, if the Democratic Party really reaches an agreement with the Republican Party, the process could be much faster. It all depends on when both sides are willing to compromise.
Implementation in 2029? I doubt it. There will probably be some surprises by then.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-07 13:48
2027? Will we still be around then? Haha
I've long been used to it; this is just the American pace—politics come first, and the crypto world is at the bottom.
Is the agreement close to being reached? Wake up, it's just another empty promise. I've seen this trick too many times.
Basically, it's just waiting for the election to finish, then they'll come up with new excuses to delay again. Anyway, we can't change anything.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-07 02:19
2027? Haha, politicians really know how to drag things out. Anyway, our coins have already risen long ago.
---
Elections and games of power again. I'm tired of this routine. We might really have to wait until 2029.
---
Talk is cheap. The Democrats say nice things, but when it’s time to sit down, they’ll bicker for half a day.
---
A typical American-style procrastination. The crypto community has already started playing on its own. Who cares when the bill will come?
---
That’s why you gotta hodl. Regulatory clarity is not a short-term issue at all.
---
2027 haha, by then the landscape will have already changed. Still waiting for American politicians?
---
If both sides could have a proper talk, that would be surprising. The two parties are now really not willing to give an inch.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKaren
· 01-06 00:50
2027? Ha, politicians really know how to play. They're all just counting on the election.
Waiting all this time, but it still ends in failure. I've seen this trick many times.
Deal? Ha, the appetites of both sides are always mismatched.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 01-06 00:48
2027? Ha, politicians really know how to drag it out... Anyway, we're used to it long ago
---
Another political game, crypto is always just a pawn
---
Waiting here, by then the market will have already turned upside down
---
The Democratic Party only cares about elections, who cares about retail investors' lives and deaths
---
Enforcement in 2029? By then, the crypto world will be unrecognizable
---
The probability of talks breaking down is actually quite high, don't be too optimistic
---
That's why self-custody is the best, don't rely on the government
---
Five years for a single bill? The US is really slow to death
---
Basically, it's just waiting for the right moment to cut the leeks
---
Protocol? I think they'll probably bicker for another two years
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-06 00:45
Wait, 2027? Then all the gas fees I saved over these years would have been for nothing, haha... I'm really just waiting to die.
Will U.S. crypto legislation have to wait until 2027? Investment banks reveal Congress's political chess game
【Crypto World】An investment bank recently released a prediction about US cryptocurrency legislation, which could disrupt many people’s expectations.
In simple terms, the path to legislation regulating the crypto market in the US might be longer than expected. According to the latest report from TD Cowen, if this bill is to pass Congress, it may have to wait until 2027, with actual implementation possibly pushed back to 2029.
Why the delay? Ultimately, it’s political game-playing. The report points out that although there is still a chance to push the bill this year, the Democrats currently have little motivation to accelerate this process. The reason is simple—they are eyeing the 2026 midterm elections, hoping to regain control of the House. Under this calculation, why rush to legislate now? It might be better to wait until the election results are clear.
However, the investment bank also mentioned that this situation is not absolute. Democrats have actually hinted that if both sides sit down to talk, an agreement could be reached quickly—after all, staff have been working on technical details for several months, and many specifics are already known. Time is on the side of the bill because as long as it passes by 2027 and takes effect in 2029, the matter will be settled.
But a more realistic issue is on the table: the crypto industry must accept that the presidential election could change the final rules; meanwhile, Democrats also need to accept that regulations like conflict of interest clauses may not apply to everyone. Politics is like that—rules often vary from person to person.