In November 2025, the Gnosis network faced a critical security challenge when a Balancer protocol vulnerability exposed the chain to a significant exploit. Over $116 million in assets were compromised in the attack, leaving the community searching for a viable recovery path. After unsuccessful initial recovery efforts and a preliminary soft fork attempt failed to resolve the situation, Gnosis leadership made a landmark decision: they would perform a hard fork to restore the affected funds and protect network integrity.
From Soft Fork to Consensus-Based Hard Fork
The timeline of Gnosis’s response reveals the escalating nature of the crisis. Early November saw the deployment of a soft fork as the first defensive measure, aimed at containing the damage without fundamentally altering the chain’s history. However, this approach proved insufficient to recover the stolen assets. Recognizing the need for more decisive action, Gnosis community members deliberated extensively before rallying behind a hard fork solution. This consensus-driven upgrade represented an unprecedented prioritization of fund recovery over blockchain immutability—a significant precedent in decentralized governance.
Recovery Success and Remaining Questions
The hard fork initiative yielded results. White-hat security researchers independently recovered $28 million of the $116 million lost amount, demonstrating community-led security efforts. The chain was then modified to invalidate the remaining compromised assets and redirect them to a secure recovery address, effectively neutralizing the attack’s impact.
What Comes Next for Gnosis
The most pressing question now centers on governance: how will the Gnosis community allocate the recovered funds and structure compensation for affected parties? These decisions will be determined through community voting and transparent processes, setting a framework for how decentralized protocols handle similar crises in the future.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Gnosis Initiates Blockchain Upgrade to Reclaim Compromised Assets Following Balancer Security Breach
The Crisis and Decisive Action
In November 2025, the Gnosis network faced a critical security challenge when a Balancer protocol vulnerability exposed the chain to a significant exploit. Over $116 million in assets were compromised in the attack, leaving the community searching for a viable recovery path. After unsuccessful initial recovery efforts and a preliminary soft fork attempt failed to resolve the situation, Gnosis leadership made a landmark decision: they would perform a hard fork to restore the affected funds and protect network integrity.
From Soft Fork to Consensus-Based Hard Fork
The timeline of Gnosis’s response reveals the escalating nature of the crisis. Early November saw the deployment of a soft fork as the first defensive measure, aimed at containing the damage without fundamentally altering the chain’s history. However, this approach proved insufficient to recover the stolen assets. Recognizing the need for more decisive action, Gnosis community members deliberated extensively before rallying behind a hard fork solution. This consensus-driven upgrade represented an unprecedented prioritization of fund recovery over blockchain immutability—a significant precedent in decentralized governance.
Recovery Success and Remaining Questions
The hard fork initiative yielded results. White-hat security researchers independently recovered $28 million of the $116 million lost amount, demonstrating community-led security efforts. The chain was then modified to invalidate the remaining compromised assets and redirect them to a secure recovery address, effectively neutralizing the attack’s impact.
What Comes Next for Gnosis
The most pressing question now centers on governance: how will the Gnosis community allocate the recovered funds and structure compensation for affected parties? These decisions will be determined through community voting and transparent processes, setting a framework for how decentralized protocols handle similar crises in the future.