【Crypto World】The cross-chain aggregated DeFi platform Infinex recently announced a series of major adjustments.
The core changes are threefold:
Investment cap has been relaxed. The previous $2,500 daily limit per user has been removed, now you can invest as much as you want, fully autonomous decision-making. This is a positive for users who want to participate with large amounts.
Distribution rules have been changed to a fair mode. From a random lottery to a “Maximum-Minimum Fair Distribution”—simply put, prioritizing allowing everyone to receive a share until tokens are exhausted. Remaining funds are fully refunded, with no waste. This can avoid disparities caused by luck.
Patron status retains priority. Holders can still participate in allocations first; the specifics of the priority will be clarified after the sale is completed.
It seems Infinex has listened to the community’s voice and aims to handle this round in a more fair and transparent manner. This attitude is still commendable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMonger
· 4h ago
removing caps on allocation? lol they're just begging for whale concentration now
Reply0
TheMemefather
· 12h ago
Remove the cap? Now big players are about to take off
Fair distribution sounds good, but I wonder how Patron gets priority
This move is pretty decent, much more reliable than the previous random lottery
Wait, all remaining funds are being refunded? Now that's really showing integrity
Infinex finally used their brains
Feels like they were awakened by community criticism haha
Lifting the cap makes me a bit nervous, big players should start dumping now
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 01-05 14:49
Canceling the cap sounds good, but the problem is, will big players rush in and get wiped out instantly? The logic of fair distribution depends on actual implementation; the "maximum-minimum" on paper doesn't necessarily mean true fairness.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 01-05 14:45
Haha, finally a platform is thinking about fairness, but canceling the cap... Big players are about to take off.
---
Maximum and minimum allocations sound pretty good, but I'm worried that the actual implementation might be another story. Let's wait and see.
---
Patron priority is still there, so it's just a change in appearance, the core still depends on holding tokens.
---
I think this round of adjustment really listened to the community's complaints. Thumbs up, but how it will be implemented later is the key.
---
Removing the 2500 limit is a bit aggressive. Will it be exploited again by large funds?
---
Fair distribution mechanism is good, at least more reliable than pure randomness. Fully refunding remaining funds is indeed considerate.
---
It sounds good, but let's see if Infinex really follows this plan in the end. Don't let it be just a new bottle with old wine.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 01-05 14:43
Removing the cap is indeed generous, but wait, does this also mean that large investors will find it easier to monopolize early shares? Can the fair distribution mechanism hold them back?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 01-05 14:33
Damn, finally the ceiling has been removed. The previous $2500 limit was really annoying.
---
Fair distribution? Sounds good, much more reliable than the previous lottery.
---
The Patron priority is still there. Honestly, some people are still more equal.
---
This round of adjustments is indeed sincere, but whether you can actually get a share still depends on luck.
---
Wait, all remaining funds are being refunded? Doesn't that mean you might not be able to grab anything at all?
---
This move feels like it was forced after hearing too many complaints.
---
Decentralized platforms are also starting to adopt this kind of fair marketing haha.
---
The wealthy are now happy, they can pile up as they like.
---
Finally, the Patron priority part is still vague. Waiting to be exploited.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 01-05 14:24
Cancel the investment cap? Now the big players will be thrilled, while small retail investors still have to queue up for shares.
---
Maximum-minimum fair distribution sounds good, but I'm worried that the implementation might be another story.
---
Patron priority is still hidden; it feels like key information is being saved for last to be announced.
---
Talking about listening to community voices, it probably means the previous operations failed, haha.
---
Full refund is quite considerate; it's better than locking up funds.
---
The mechanism adjustment shows sincerity; now it depends on whether the actual launch can meet the promises.
Infinex Major Update: Removed Investment Cap and Switched to Fair Distribution Mechanism
【Crypto World】The cross-chain aggregated DeFi platform Infinex recently announced a series of major adjustments.
The core changes are threefold:
Investment cap has been relaxed. The previous $2,500 daily limit per user has been removed, now you can invest as much as you want, fully autonomous decision-making. This is a positive for users who want to participate with large amounts.
Distribution rules have been changed to a fair mode. From a random lottery to a “Maximum-Minimum Fair Distribution”—simply put, prioritizing allowing everyone to receive a share until tokens are exhausted. Remaining funds are fully refunded, with no waste. This can avoid disparities caused by luck.
Patron status retains priority. Holders can still participate in allocations first; the specifics of the priority will be clarified after the sale is completed.
It seems Infinex has listened to the community’s voice and aims to handle this round in a more fair and transparent manner. This attitude is still commendable.