Source: Yellow
Original Title: New research article identifies six open problems in blockchain privacy technology
Original Link:
Researchers from Mysten Labs, Yale University, and George Mason University published an updated version of a comprehensive academic study examining privacy-preserving techniques in blockchain systems.
The article titled “SoK: Privacy-Preserving Transactions in Blockchains” was initially presented in December 2024 and revised on January 3, 2026.
Among the authors are Foteini Baldimtsi from George Mason University and Mysten Labs, Kostas Kryptos Chalkias from Mysten Labs, Varun Madathil from Yale University, and Arnab Roy from Mysten Labs.
The knowledge systematization article analyzes privacy techniques in blockchain architectures based on both UTxO and account models.
What happened
The 32-page research paper classifies privacy levels, including confidentiality, k-anonymity, full anonymity, and unlinkability between sender and receiver.
The researchers analyzed deployed systems such as Zcash, Monero, Dash, and Firo, along with academic proposals.
The study identified six open problems in blockchain privacy, including stateless verification, support for lightweight clients, and efficient anonymous account-based systems.
The researchers evaluated the usability of major privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, including transaction speed, ease of use, and unique features.
The article reviews cryptographic techniques such as zero-knowledge proofs, ring signatures, stealth addresses, and mixing protocols.
Why it matters
The research provides a framework for comparing privacy solutions as blockchain developers face increasing regulatory scrutiny.
According to the conclusions, no existing system simultaneously offers strong anonymity, sublinear on-chain data growth, and verification for lightweight clients.
The article notes that achieving full anonymity in account-based systems requires validation work proportional to the total number of users, making it impractical.
The researchers conclude that designing privacy-preserving blockchains involves fundamental trade-offs among privacy guarantees, scalability, and regulatory compliance.
The study serves as a technical reference for protocol designers choosing privacy mechanisms based on specific constraints and requirements.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTherapist
· 3h ago
Privacy issues haven't been resolved yet. That's the real pain point of blockchain, right? Papers are one thing, but practical applications will have to wait a bit longer.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 4h ago
six open problems in blockchain privacy... tbh this is exactly the kind of thing ppl should be reading but won't. mysten, yale, mason doing actual research here which is refreshing ngl
Reply0
SerRugResistant
· 17h ago
Privacy still has a bunch of pitfalls to fill, and the six questions sound quite conservative, to be honest.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStation
· 01-05 01:57
Privacy issues have always been a pain point in blockchain. The six open questions indicate there's still a long way to go.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-05 01:56
Privacy issues haven't been resolved yet... This batch of researchers needs to work harder. Don't just talk the talk; only by actually using it on-chain will you realize how deep the water really is.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-05 01:55
Six questions are still open, privacy is really still a work in progress, but Mysten and their team have been tinkering around without any major breakthroughs.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-05 01:32
Privacy issues have always been a tough problem; six pitfalls are quite a lot... need to see what the pain points are.
New research article identifies six open issues in blockchain privacy technology
Source: Yellow Original Title: New research article identifies six open problems in blockchain privacy technology
Original Link: Researchers from Mysten Labs, Yale University, and George Mason University published an updated version of a comprehensive academic study examining privacy-preserving techniques in blockchain systems.
The article titled “SoK: Privacy-Preserving Transactions in Blockchains” was initially presented in December 2024 and revised on January 3, 2026.
Among the authors are Foteini Baldimtsi from George Mason University and Mysten Labs, Kostas Kryptos Chalkias from Mysten Labs, Varun Madathil from Yale University, and Arnab Roy from Mysten Labs.
The knowledge systematization article analyzes privacy techniques in blockchain architectures based on both UTxO and account models.
What happened
The 32-page research paper classifies privacy levels, including confidentiality, k-anonymity, full anonymity, and unlinkability between sender and receiver.
The researchers analyzed deployed systems such as Zcash, Monero, Dash, and Firo, along with academic proposals.
The study identified six open problems in blockchain privacy, including stateless verification, support for lightweight clients, and efficient anonymous account-based systems.
The researchers evaluated the usability of major privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, including transaction speed, ease of use, and unique features.
The article reviews cryptographic techniques such as zero-knowledge proofs, ring signatures, stealth addresses, and mixing protocols.
Why it matters
The research provides a framework for comparing privacy solutions as blockchain developers face increasing regulatory scrutiny.
According to the conclusions, no existing system simultaneously offers strong anonymity, sublinear on-chain data growth, and verification for lightweight clients.
The article notes that achieving full anonymity in account-based systems requires validation work proportional to the total number of users, making it impractical.
The researchers conclude that designing privacy-preserving blockchains involves fundamental trade-offs among privacy guarantees, scalability, and regulatory compliance.
The study serves as a technical reference for protocol designers choosing privacy mechanisms based on specific constraints and requirements.