The Valuation Paradox: Why Premium Growth Stocks Trade at Bargain Prices
One of the most curious aspects of the current market dynamics surrounds Nvidia(NASDAQ: NVDA). Despite delivering extraordinary performance throughout 2025, the semiconductor giant’s valuation multiples tell a surprisingly different story. Trading at a [forward price-to-earnings]( ratio of 25, the company sits modestly below the Nasdaq-100’s average multiple of 26 — and trades well below Amazon (28) and Apple (33). For a company boasting 62% year-over-year revenue growth in Q3 alone, this seems counterintuitive.
The numbers supporting this valuation are nothing short of remarkable. Q3 revenues hit an unprecedented $57 billion, driven predominantly by data center operations where Nvidia’s advanced [graphics processing units]( dominate the market for training and running [large language models]( That growth translated to $31.9 billion in net income — a 65% increase year-over-year. Add to this a $62.2 billion share repurchase authorization, and on paper, Nvidia’s stock appears to be an attractive entry point for 2026.
Yet the modest valuation multiple relative to growth suggests Wall Street harbors deeper concerns about the company’s long-term trajectory.
The AI Capex Conundrum: When Spending Outpaces Returns
Here lies the central tension facing Nvidia investors heading into 2026: while the company’s own fundamentals remain robust, the broader AI ecosystem is burning capital at an alarming rate.
Goldman Sachs projects that hyperscalers — the cloud computing giants powering the AI revolution — could deploy up to $527 billion in [capital expenditure]( during 2026 alone. This represents a staggering commitment to infrastructure, built on the assumption that eventual returns will justify the outlay. However, the sustainability of this spending spree remains questionable. Shareholders at Meta, Google, and Microsoft are beginning to ask harder questions: when will this speculative capex translate into tangible profitability?
The consumer-facing AI economy paints an even grimmer picture. Deutsche Bank analysts have estimated that OpenAI — the industry leader — could consume $143 billion through 2029 while still operating at a loss. This cash burn dynamic underscores a fundamental problem: generative AI companies are currently spending far more to deliver services than they generate in revenue.
The planned second-half 2026 IPO of OpenAI could serve as a watershed moment for the industry. A public market debut would force transparency around these economics, potentially shocking investors accustomed to the permissive funding environment of recent years.
Why Nvidia Remains Insulated (But Not Immune)
Operating in the “pick-and-shovel” space — supplying the hardware upon which AI companies build — has historically protected Nvidia from the most severe industry downturns. The company captures value regardless of whether individual AI ventures prove profitable. New product launches, including the Blackwell generation currently seeing “off the charts” demand (per CEO Jensen Huang) and the forthcoming Rubin class of GPUs tailored for AI video synthesis, should support robust growth through 2026.
However, this insulation has limits. Nvidia’s exceptional gross margins — typically exceeding 70% — depend on maintaining pricing power and volume. A meaningful slowdown in capex spending would inevitably compress these margins as the company faces inventory pressures and competitive discounting.
The 2026 Outlook: Growth Continuation With Valuation Headwinds
The trajectory appears clear: hyperscalers have signaled commitment to accelerating AI-related spending in 2026, suggesting Nvidia’s operational momentum will persist. New product cycles and data center demand dynamics point toward continued revenue and earnings expansion.
However, investors should not expect Nvidia stock to replicate its 2025 performance. As the AI narrative matures and questions mount about the underlying business model sustainability, stock price appreciation will likely decelerate. The reasonable valuation today reflects market skepticism about how long the AI capex cycle can sustain itself.
The investment case for Nvidia entering 2026 is nuanced: a fundamentally strong business operating within an industry facing profound questions about returns on capital. For long-term investors, the risk-reward profile merits serious consideration — but past performance and near-term growth do not guarantee future prosperity in an industry still finding its business model.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Is Nvidia Overvalued or Undervalued Heading Into 2026?
The Valuation Paradox: Why Premium Growth Stocks Trade at Bargain Prices
One of the most curious aspects of the current market dynamics surrounds Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). Despite delivering extraordinary performance throughout 2025, the semiconductor giant’s valuation multiples tell a surprisingly different story. Trading at a [forward price-to-earnings]( ratio of 25, the company sits modestly below the Nasdaq-100’s average multiple of 26 — and trades well below Amazon (28) and Apple (33). For a company boasting 62% year-over-year revenue growth in Q3 alone, this seems counterintuitive.
The numbers supporting this valuation are nothing short of remarkable. Q3 revenues hit an unprecedented $57 billion, driven predominantly by data center operations where Nvidia’s advanced [graphics processing units]( dominate the market for training and running [large language models]( That growth translated to $31.9 billion in net income — a 65% increase year-over-year. Add to this a $62.2 billion share repurchase authorization, and on paper, Nvidia’s stock appears to be an attractive entry point for 2026.
Yet the modest valuation multiple relative to growth suggests Wall Street harbors deeper concerns about the company’s long-term trajectory.
The AI Capex Conundrum: When Spending Outpaces Returns
Here lies the central tension facing Nvidia investors heading into 2026: while the company’s own fundamentals remain robust, the broader AI ecosystem is burning capital at an alarming rate.
Goldman Sachs projects that hyperscalers — the cloud computing giants powering the AI revolution — could deploy up to $527 billion in [capital expenditure]( during 2026 alone. This represents a staggering commitment to infrastructure, built on the assumption that eventual returns will justify the outlay. However, the sustainability of this spending spree remains questionable. Shareholders at Meta, Google, and Microsoft are beginning to ask harder questions: when will this speculative capex translate into tangible profitability?
The consumer-facing AI economy paints an even grimmer picture. Deutsche Bank analysts have estimated that OpenAI — the industry leader — could consume $143 billion through 2029 while still operating at a loss. This cash burn dynamic underscores a fundamental problem: generative AI companies are currently spending far more to deliver services than they generate in revenue.
The planned second-half 2026 IPO of OpenAI could serve as a watershed moment for the industry. A public market debut would force transparency around these economics, potentially shocking investors accustomed to the permissive funding environment of recent years.
Why Nvidia Remains Insulated (But Not Immune)
Operating in the “pick-and-shovel” space — supplying the hardware upon which AI companies build — has historically protected Nvidia from the most severe industry downturns. The company captures value regardless of whether individual AI ventures prove profitable. New product launches, including the Blackwell generation currently seeing “off the charts” demand (per CEO Jensen Huang) and the forthcoming Rubin class of GPUs tailored for AI video synthesis, should support robust growth through 2026.
However, this insulation has limits. Nvidia’s exceptional gross margins — typically exceeding 70% — depend on maintaining pricing power and volume. A meaningful slowdown in capex spending would inevitably compress these margins as the company faces inventory pressures and competitive discounting.
The 2026 Outlook: Growth Continuation With Valuation Headwinds
The trajectory appears clear: hyperscalers have signaled commitment to accelerating AI-related spending in 2026, suggesting Nvidia’s operational momentum will persist. New product cycles and data center demand dynamics point toward continued revenue and earnings expansion.
However, investors should not expect Nvidia stock to replicate its 2025 performance. As the AI narrative matures and questions mount about the underlying business model sustainability, stock price appreciation will likely decelerate. The reasonable valuation today reflects market skepticism about how long the AI capex cycle can sustain itself.
The investment case for Nvidia entering 2026 is nuanced: a fundamentally strong business operating within an industry facing profound questions about returns on capital. For long-term investors, the risk-reward profile merits serious consideration — but past performance and near-term growth do not guarantee future prosperity in an industry still finding its business model.