Here's something wild: only a third of S&P 500 stocks actually beat the index itself. That's why active fund managers got absolutely torched last year—just 27% managed to outperform. The culprit? Massive underweight bets on Mag 7 names while overcomplicating everything else. Classic midwit move. Turns out sometimes the obvious play was the right one. Whether this pattern repeats in 2026... honestly, who knows. Could be completely different ballgame by then.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ExpectationFarmer
· 18h ago
ngl that move 7 really revealed how many people simply can't recognize the overall trend
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverCharts
· 18h ago
ngl, that's why I don't touch active funds, it's still more satisfying to go all-in on the seven giants
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 19h ago
Nah, that's why I never trust active funds. The game where you win 7 out of 10 times and earn profits, anyone who plays it ends up losing money.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 19h ago
ngl Mag 7 Nabo is really a living textbook example of a cautionary tale, insisting on operating counter to the market... Isn't this just creating difficulty for oneself?
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 19h ago
ngl That's why I went all in on big companies a long time ago. People still studying fundamentals are really overthinking it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 19h ago
NGL, the seven major tech stocks really crushed it, while active fund managers are still playing complex strategies, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 19h ago
Some fund managers were really cut down by the seven giants last year, it's just that they overthought everything.
Here's something wild: only a third of S&P 500 stocks actually beat the index itself. That's why active fund managers got absolutely torched last year—just 27% managed to outperform. The culprit? Massive underweight bets on Mag 7 names while overcomplicating everything else. Classic midwit move. Turns out sometimes the obvious play was the right one. Whether this pattern repeats in 2026... honestly, who knows. Could be completely different ballgame by then.