There are indeed many opinions about CC. Some believe that this project exposes obvious liquidity issues—trading volume is pitifully low, yet the market cap is ridiculously high. This stark contrast alone warrants caution.
However, another perspective also makes sense. Large transactions are actually completed in the OTC market, and institutional and project-party agreements are not recorded on the public blockchain. This explains why the public trading surface appears quiet, while the actual circulating supply is much larger than the surface numbers.
More importantly, there is a supply-side problem. A large amount of CC is frozen in node contracts and cannot be moved in the short term. This results in very few tokens available for free trading—even with sparse buy orders, a few trades can push the price upward. Limited liquidity is enough to support an inflated on-chain market cap.
Therefore, whether this is a scam or a structural feature may require in-depth on-chain data analysis to determine.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MrRightClick
· 5h ago
I've heard this OTC explanation so many times, anyway, since I can't see it, I might as well just consider it reasonable, haha.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 5h ago
OTC trading has a bunch of frozen chips, and this explanation sounds just like the usual... The only ones truly capable of moving are those, no wonder the price is easily pushed.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 5h ago
The OTC explanation is just for listening; do truly capable projects need to hide and cover up like this... I've seen many cases of freezing chips, and honestly, it's just fear of crashing the market.
There are indeed many opinions about CC. Some believe that this project exposes obvious liquidity issues—trading volume is pitifully low, yet the market cap is ridiculously high. This stark contrast alone warrants caution.
However, another perspective also makes sense. Large transactions are actually completed in the OTC market, and institutional and project-party agreements are not recorded on the public blockchain. This explains why the public trading surface appears quiet, while the actual circulating supply is much larger than the surface numbers.
More importantly, there is a supply-side problem. A large amount of CC is frozen in node contracts and cannot be moved in the short term. This results in very few tokens available for free trading—even with sparse buy orders, a few trades can push the price upward. Limited liquidity is enough to support an inflated on-chain market cap.
Therefore, whether this is a scam or a structural feature may require in-depth on-chain data analysis to determine.