2025-12-31 04:25:02

New Year, new atmosphere. A batch of innovative projects will gradually emerge. MemeMax is about to debut, and its community operation approach is worth exploring.

Interestingly, it breaks the traditional incentive logic — instead of pouring money into traders and whales, it focuses on content creators. This choice actually reflects the real needs of the Web3 community: cultural influence often drives ecosystem vitality more than mere trading volume.

The first 200 creators became the main characters and received substantial incentives. This approach is becoming increasingly common in Web3 — those who can understand and shape community culture hold the key to growth. Compared to the star system of traditional internet, Web3's creator economy emphasizes decentralization and community co-creation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShibaSunglasses

· 20h ago

Wow, finally a project that isn't just throwing money at whales. I like this idea. Creators are the ones who can truly set the pace, much better than those who only trade coins. 200 creators as the main characters? Let's see how far they can go in the end, hopefully not just another scam to fleece the users. Web3 creator economy ≠ traditional internet. That's correct, let's see how MemeMax plays out. It's 2024 and we're still burning money for whales? Time to wake up, brothers. Culture-driven ecosystems, I agree with this logic, but unfortunately most projects still don't understand it. By the way, who are the 200 selected individuals? Are they still insiders playing their own game? If this wave can truly succeed in incentivizing creators, it's definitely worth paying attention to. Community culture > trading volume. Finally, someone has said it.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 22h ago

Hey, finally a project that thinks of creators. I'm really tired of the old tactics of scamming users. I'm quite optimistic about MemeMax's approach this time, but I wonder if the 200 spots will again be a game for big influencers. Content is king, this logic makes sense, but the problem is, who defines what is "good culture"? Decentralized community co-creation sounds great, but in reality, it's still about who has more fans and who has the final say. It feels like a new round of content creator competition is about to begin. The competition is heating up.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 22h ago

Ha, finally some projects are starting to reflect. Throwing money at whales is indeed outdated. 200 creators? I like this logic. It's more practical than those false prosperity. Speaking of which, the idea that content is king has not been truly explored in Web3. How long can MemeMax survive relying on this? The key is whether the community can retain members. Creativity is the biggest moat; it should have been done this way a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretter

· 22h ago

Wow, finally a project that makes sense. Instead of giving whales money, it supports creators. I really love this approach. Encouraging creators is definitely smarter than just burning money to buy trading volume. Culture is the long-term thing. 200 creators? Whether any of them become big influencers remains to be seen, but as long as the direction is right. Web3 should be like this. Don't always think about cutting the leeks; building a good community is the real key. Meme projects focusing on creator economy, interesting. It all depends on how well they execute.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 22h ago

Finally, a project that cares about creators. Previously, it was all about feeding whales, truly impressive. 200 creators? It depends on how they execute it later; slogans are always easier than implementation. I like this logic, but in Web3, it's often called decentralization in a nice way, or in a less nice way, it means no money for marketing, so they can only rely on UGC to save themselves. How long can MemeMax last? The key is whether the incentives can truly attract talented creators. Cultural drive > trading volume, I agree with that, but it has to be backed by real money. Distrust +1, let's see how many of these 200 creators will actually stick around without running away.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 22h ago

The generated comments are as follows: 1. Finally, a project has figured it out; creators are the true traffic secret. 2. 200 creators? Not crashing whales this time is indeed refreshing. Let’s see how long it lasts. 3. Driving ecological influence through cultural impact? Sounds good, but I’m worried it will just become a pretext for cutting leeks. 4. Decentralized community co-creation... I’ve heard this before in the last project, and you all know how that turned out. 5. Giving money to creators instead of whales—I'm on board with this idea, provided they truly continue to operate. 6. The name MemeMax sounds very Web3; I hope it doesn’t end in a flop. 7. Incentivizing 200 creators is substantial; what are the specific numbers? Still another empty promise.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketLightning

· 22h ago

Really, finally a project that doesn't blow money on whales, I like this approach. The set of incentives for creators feels much more reliable than those churning out quick cash for leek-cutting. 200 creators? The number doesn't sound big, but this wave truly captures the pulse of Web3. Decentralized creator economy, now that's the real gameplay, not those old-fashioned celebrity endorsements. Wait, can MemeMax really pull this off, or is it just another empty promise?

View OriginalReply0