Today, let's analyze an interesting token deflation model — it automatically destroys tokens through transaction fees, with the entire process executed independently by on-chain code, requiring no manual intervention.
**The core operational logic is very clear**
Every time a user buys or sells, 3% of the transaction amount in BNB is deducted as a fee. This fee bypasses any wallet and directly goes into the contract address. When the BNB accumulated in the contract reaches more than 0.1, the system automatically triggers a buyback — purchasing the corresponding tokens from a DEX pool, then immediately sending them to a black hole address for destruction. The BNB used for buybacks remains permanently in the liquidity pool, growing thicker over time.
It sounds simple, but this design is actually very clever. The total supply of tokens is continuously destroyed with each transaction, while the depth of the pool also increases in tandem. The result is increasingly better liquidity and a scarcer token — a positive feedback loop.
**Why this mechanism is worth paying attention to**
First, the entire process runs entirely on-chain, with no centralized system involved, and no DAPP that requires trust. Second, the contract's permissions have been completely relinquished; the code is open-source, with no backdoors, no upgrade permissions, and no freeze functions. Every step is automated, so no one can suddenly change rules or halt the process. From a code perspective, this is 100% transparent.
However, the impact of this model on token price stability still needs ongoing observation, as whether automatic destruction can truly support long-term value depends on the development of ecological applications.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 23h ago
Uh, this design sounds pretty good, but is a 3% fee a bit harsh? It seems like it might discourage a lot of people from trading.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxiety
· 2025-12-31 04:37
Hmm, this design is indeed perfect. With complete automation, no one can have crooked ideas.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 2025-12-31 04:24
This design sounds good, but I still have some doubts about whether it can really support the coin price.
Today, let's analyze an interesting token deflation model — it automatically destroys tokens through transaction fees, with the entire process executed independently by on-chain code, requiring no manual intervention.
**The core operational logic is very clear**
Every time a user buys or sells, 3% of the transaction amount in BNB is deducted as a fee. This fee bypasses any wallet and directly goes into the contract address. When the BNB accumulated in the contract reaches more than 0.1, the system automatically triggers a buyback — purchasing the corresponding tokens from a DEX pool, then immediately sending them to a black hole address for destruction. The BNB used for buybacks remains permanently in the liquidity pool, growing thicker over time.
It sounds simple, but this design is actually very clever. The total supply of tokens is continuously destroyed with each transaction, while the depth of the pool also increases in tandem. The result is increasingly better liquidity and a scarcer token — a positive feedback loop.
**Why this mechanism is worth paying attention to**
First, the entire process runs entirely on-chain, with no centralized system involved, and no DAPP that requires trust. Second, the contract's permissions have been completely relinquished; the code is open-source, with no backdoors, no upgrade permissions, and no freeze functions. Every step is automated, so no one can suddenly change rules or halt the process. From a code perspective, this is 100% transparent.
However, the impact of this model on token price stability still needs ongoing observation, as whether automatic destruction can truly support long-term value depends on the development of ecological applications.